Tunnel Engineering Handbook 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0449-4_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunneling in Difficult Ground

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of the time-dependency of ground behaviour, the overall advance rate not only represents the main outcome of the complex interaction between the ground, the TBM and the tunnel support, but also exercises a decisive influence over this interaction (Ramoni and Anagnostou 2010c). More specifically, as emphasized repeatedly in the literature, a rapid excavation rate (involving high net advance rates and short standstills) reduces the risk of the shield or back-up jamming (e.g., Herrenknecht and Rehm 2007;Kovári 1986a, b;Lombardi 1981;McCusker 1996;Robbins 1982). The frequency and duration of standstills can be reduced through appropriate operational measures and construction site organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As a consequence of the time-dependency of ground behaviour, the overall advance rate not only represents the main outcome of the complex interaction between the ground, the TBM and the tunnel support, but also exercises a decisive influence over this interaction (Ramoni and Anagnostou 2010c). More specifically, as emphasized repeatedly in the literature, a rapid excavation rate (involving high net advance rates and short standstills) reduces the risk of the shield or back-up jamming (e.g., Herrenknecht and Rehm 2007;Kovári 1986a, b;Lombardi 1981;McCusker 1996;Robbins 1982). The frequency and duration of standstills can be reduced through appropriate operational measures and construction site organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%