“…From the agreements between the experimental data and the calculations, we have obtained the representative gap values 2D = 4 -5 meV, 8 -14 meV, and 18 -24 meV [5,6]. The smallest gap is commonly observed except for the NMR technique, and the existence of the middle-size gap is consistent with the photoemission data suggesting the surface gap [5,6,7,8]. For the largest gap, the tunnelling conductance can be described by the Gaussian gap distribution model, which suggests the existence of the spatial inhomogeneity and/or the gap anisotropy arising from the layered crystal structure [5,9].…”