1962
DOI: 10.1021/j100809a040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunnelling Corrections for Unsymmetrical Eckart Potential Energy Barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
345
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 480 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
345
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Eckart potential, frequently used to estimate the tunneling probability of the reaction, 68 the transmission probability as a function of energy E is potential is written for an exoergic reaction, i.e., V 1 ഛ V 2 , and * is the absolute value of the imaginary frequency. The GAUSSIAN 98 program supports the intrinsic reaction coordinate ͑IRC͒ calculation for the MP2 and DFT methods, but not for the CC method.…”
Section: Appendix B: the Tunneling Probability For An Eckart Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Eckart potential, frequently used to estimate the tunneling probability of the reaction, 68 the transmission probability as a function of energy E is potential is written for an exoergic reaction, i.e., V 1 ഛ V 2 , and * is the absolute value of the imaginary frequency. The GAUSSIAN 98 program supports the intrinsic reaction coordinate ͑IRC͒ calculation for the MP2 and DFT methods, but not for the CC method.…”
Section: Appendix B: the Tunneling Probability For An Eckart Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K depends on E and three other parameters which are determined by the shape of the barrier and an effective mass for the system. Johnston and Heicklen [3] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometries, vibrational frequencies and energies of the stable species and the transition state in R3 were obtained using the methods described in Section 2.1. An additional Eckart tunneling correction [7,20] was included in the computations due to the high value of the imaginary frequency (1695 cm −1 ) of the tight transition state. For the chosen range of the temperatures that reaction R3 was fitted to, the correction term ranges from a factor of 3 to a factor of 1.06.…”
Section: Rate Constant Estimationsmentioning
confidence: 99%