1995
DOI: 10.1086/629747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbidity Currents Generated at River Mouths during Exceptional Discharges to the World Oceans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
569
0
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 774 publications
(587 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
569
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…For concentrations in excess of ∼30 g L −1 , the density of the sediment-laden meltwater exceeds the density of the ambient fjord seawater measured in Columbia Fjord (Mulder and Syvitski, 1995;personal communication from S. Gay, 2011), and the resulting high-concentration gravity flows are capable of carrying sediment along the fjord seabed far from the source (e.g. Prior and others, 1987;Syvitski and others, 1987;Willems and others, 2011).…”
Section: Implications For the Formation And Evolution Of Fjord Sedimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For concentrations in excess of ∼30 g L −1 , the density of the sediment-laden meltwater exceeds the density of the ambient fjord seawater measured in Columbia Fjord (Mulder and Syvitski, 1995;personal communication from S. Gay, 2011), and the resulting high-concentration gravity flows are capable of carrying sediment along the fjord seabed far from the source (e.g. Prior and others, 1987;Syvitski and others, 1987;Willems and others, 2011).…”
Section: Implications For the Formation And Evolution Of Fjord Sedimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the repeated alternation of massive muds and IRD-rich layers deposited at sites MD95-2002 and MD03-2692 between ca 18.3 and 17 ka is interpreted as having formed by rainout through a combination of continuous suspension settling of turbid hypopycnal surface plumes from the 'Fleuve Manche', which originate from the significant density difference between glacial meltwater and cold seawater (e.g. Mulder and Syvitski, 1995), and episodic IRD input. Though the source of the muds is unambiguously attributed to the 'Fleuve Manche', the source of the IRD nevertheless remains unclear.…”
Section: Genetic Interpretation Of Laminated Sediments and Palaeoenvimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Delgada Fan is from the California borderland, a small-active continental margin (Somme et al 2009), characterized by the strong longshore drift-feed of their canyons in a narrow continental shelf (Covault et al 2007). These two sedimentological parameters combined have great capacity to generate high-density turbidity currents at continental slope canyons (Piper & Aksu 1987, Mulder & Syvitski 1995, Mulder et al 2003, therefore Delgada Fan is more inclined to be dominated by HDTC than Magdalena Fan, supporting HDTC fans as good analogs to Delgada Fan.…”
Section: Comparison With Modern Deep-water Fansmentioning
confidence: 99%