Proceedings of ICC'97 - International Conference on Communications
DOI: 10.1109/icc.1997.595038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbo-detection: a new approach to combat channel frequency selectivity

Abstract: In this paper, is proposed a receiver to combat Intersymbol Interference (ISI) generated over a frequency selective channel. The receiver is based on a symbol detector and a channel decoder separated by a deinterleaver. Through an iterative detecting-decoding process, using turbo-codes principle, the so-called turbo-detector manages to overcome frequency selectivity, especially over a Gaussian channel. Simulation results show the turbo-detector efficiency over both Gaussian and GSM channels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the MLSE approach, which directly relies on the subchannel impulse response, could be much better, but its exponential increase in complexity with respect to the impulse response length presents a big disadvantage, so that it can be prohibitive for practical implementation. On the other hand, the invention of the Turbo codes by Claude Berrou at al., [10], and the iterative algorithms [11] started to be used to implement the Turbo equalization or Turbo interferences cancellation [12], with just linear complexity with respect to the channel impulse response lengths. Whatsoever, the concatenation of the soft successive self-interference cancellation and channel decoding procedure in Turbo mode, [13], offers additional enhancement of the overall performance.…”
Section: Development Of the Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the MLSE approach, which directly relies on the subchannel impulse response, could be much better, but its exponential increase in complexity with respect to the impulse response length presents a big disadvantage, so that it can be prohibitive for practical implementation. On the other hand, the invention of the Turbo codes by Claude Berrou at al., [10], and the iterative algorithms [11] started to be used to implement the Turbo equalization or Turbo interferences cancellation [12], with just linear complexity with respect to the channel impulse response lengths. Whatsoever, the concatenation of the soft successive self-interference cancellation and channel decoding procedure in Turbo mode, [13], offers additional enhancement of the overall performance.…”
Section: Development Of the Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each iteration, the equalizer and the decoder compute a posteriori probabilities (APPs) and extrinsic probabilities on the coded bits [7]. They exchange the extrinsic probabilities which will be used as a priori probabilities to improve iteratively their performance.…”
Section: Iterative Soft Channel Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soft outputs produced by each decoder are passed to the other decoder where they serve as a priori information after removal of information already processed at earlier iterations, so that only the so-called extrinsic (new) information is processed at each iteration. This structure was later extended to QPSK signals [10] and SISO modules employing the MAP update rule were used in a mobile communicationscontext in [11]. Due to the bandwidth and coding gain efficiency of trellis-coded modulation (TCM) for frequency selective channels, some effort has also focused recently on the development of turbo equalizers for TCM signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%