Turbulent Sounds 2010
DOI: 10.1515/9783110226584.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulence and phonology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the first words containing different manners of articulation are words conforming to a PVF(V) pattern, and the fact that in some of these words post-vocalic stops might actually be replaced by fricatives, is expected from an articulatory point of view: Ohala and Solé (2008) relate the emergence of intervocalic fricatives to phenomena of coarticulation. In some cases, the release noise of stops is prolonged before high vowels leading to the emergence of a fricative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the first words containing different manners of articulation are words conforming to a PVF(V) pattern, and the fact that in some of these words post-vocalic stops might actually be replaced by fricatives, is expected from an articulatory point of view: Ohala and Solé (2008) relate the emergence of intervocalic fricatives to phenomena of coarticulation. In some cases, the release noise of stops is prolonged before high vowels leading to the emergence of a fricative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for example, obstruent voicing is expected to be less before nasals, laterals and the alveolar trill than before approximants. The absence of much regressive voicing before nasals and laterals may co-occur with a delay in velar lowering and in the opening of the lateral mouth passages during the obstruent; this could be so since changes in oral pressure associated with nasality and in oral pressure and lingual configuration associated with laterality may conflict with the generation of a highly intense frication noise for fricatives and a perceptually prominent burst for stops (Solé, 2007(Solé, , 2009Ohala and Solé, 2010). As for the trill /r/, the lack of voicing in the preceding obstruent could be related to the high production requirements involved in keeping the tongue tip vibrating for a relatively long period of time, i.e., a sufficient pressure difference across the oral constriction, some tongue predorsum lowering and postdorsum retraction, and the right amount of tongue muscle tension in order to set the tongue tip into vibration (Solé, 2002).…”
Section: Segmental Factors Impinging On Voicing Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the failure for /rs/ to undergo stop insertion and to exhibit a well-defined burst may be attributed to a weak closure resulting from the antagonistic manner requirements involved in the performance of the tongue tip vibration for a syllable final trill and the generation of audible turbulence for the lingual fricative (Ohala & Sol ⁄ e 2010, Sol ⁄ e 2009. A longer oral stop closure for clusters with a laminopredorsal C1 (/¥s,¯s/) than for those with a labial or an apicolaminal C1 (/ms, ns, ls, rs/) appears to be related to differences in tongue contact size.…”
Section: Perception Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%