2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulence modeling of deep dynamic stall at relatively low Reynolds number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
102
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From about 18.8º to 21º, the SST k-ω model predicted a sudden increase in the slope of the C L curve. This is similar to the simulation results by other researchers [29,38,39]; however this does not take place in reality for the S809 airfoil as the measurements indicate. The second rise in the lift coefficient after stall is due to the high-vorticity secondary LEV , which grows rapidly and creates a second peak in the lift curve [38].…”
Section: Pitching Motionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From about 18.8º to 21º, the SST k-ω model predicted a sudden increase in the slope of the C L curve. This is similar to the simulation results by other researchers [29,38,39]; however this does not take place in reality for the S809 airfoil as the measurements indicate. The second rise in the lift coefficient after stall is due to the high-vorticity secondary LEV , which grows rapidly and creates a second peak in the lift curve [38].…”
Section: Pitching Motionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The appearance of the second lift peak was successfully predicted but with a much lower magnitude than the measurements. During the downstroke, the proposed CFD model still fared quite well, although for dynamic stall occurring in deep stall regime, an accurate prediction of the downstroke flow usually cannot be warranted [39]. As in the case of the CFD simulation for the stall development regime, the drag coefficient was successfully predicted at low AOA, but at high AOA during the upstroke, it was over-predicted.…”
Section: Pitching Motionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The FVM is a discretization technique used commonly in CFD modeling of flapping foil. Amiralaei et al [13,18], Lu et al [15,19], Young et al [20,21] and Wang et al [11,22,23] are the example of researchers used FVM in their CFD simulations to study flapping foil performance. The convective and diffusive terms are discretized using a second order central differencing scheme.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reach the stable and reliable results in the present simulation the results are reported after 5 flapping cycle. This policy is chosen because the unstable vortex shedding are not formed in the appropriate manner at the early steps of simulation [23]. The motion of the airfoil is modeled using dynamic mesh technique and more details can be found in [17].…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the lack of robust CFD methods, most CFD works were done only focusing on the validation of the CFD codes rather than the physical phenomena of the flow. Wang et al (Wang et al 2010;Wang et al 2012) demonstrated that the Shear-Stress-Transport (SST) k − ω turbulence model gave better prediction compared to the Wilcox k − ω for 2D case, but the predicted aerodynamic polar was rather non-smooth with a strong non-physical fluctuation along the whole range of α. Belkheir et al (Belkheir et al 2012) performed 2D and 3D CFD calculations of an airfoil using k − ε and SST k − ω models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%