The Ninth Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37543)
DOI: 10.1109/itherm.2004.1319214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulence modelling and it's impact on CFD predictions for cooling of electronic components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The velocity distribution and pressure difference values for different cases give orientated opinion about the importance of roof on the houses. This important contribution will supply a benefit on decreasing the energy costs in winter days and improving the Flow structure around the bluff body (rectangular and pyramid geometries) [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The velocity distribution and pressure difference values for different cases give orientated opinion about the importance of roof on the houses. This important contribution will supply a benefit on decreasing the energy costs in winter days and improving the Flow structure around the bluff body (rectangular and pyramid geometries) [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually classified as being low Reynolds number flow due to the small velocities and length scales encountered. The formulation for Launder and Spalding's turbulence model consists of two transport equations, one equation to describe the kinetic energy of turbulence and a second related to the rate of turbulent dissipation [21]. As it has been stated in many previous studies, k À e model is valid for low air velocities and it is also used in this work [22].…”
Section: Model Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, the practical usefulness of the model has been demonstrated by many workers, including Rodgers et al [233], Dhinsa et al [234], and Choi et al [235]. The latter report that the LVEL model was as effective as the more advanced two-equation models for simulating rack-mounted servers, with the big advantage being that ''significant computation time can be saved (factor of three or higher), especially when conducting transient CFD simulations or when making steady-state runs with different rack settings".…”
Section: The Phoenics Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This subject has been frequently discussed in the literature [5,8,9,11]. As discussed in the preceding paragraphs, the accuracy of a complex numerical CFD model is not necessarily greater than a first-order analysis, especially if the modeling process is not appropriately performed with consideration of both physics modeling and numerical accuracy.…”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%