2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.5.084603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulence statistics and coherent structures in compressible channel flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

23
66
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
23
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…for higher Re * τ (Yao & Hussain 2020). Figure 8 shows the distribution of the normalized intensity of wall pressure fluctuations as a function of the Reynolds number.…”
Section: Spatial Evolution Of Mean and Turbulence Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for higher Re * τ (Yao & Hussain 2020). Figure 8 shows the distribution of the normalized intensity of wall pressure fluctuations as a function of the Reynolds number.…”
Section: Spatial Evolution Of Mean and Turbulence Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the boundary-layer turbulence would be better established at a higher Reynolds number and less likely to suffer from low-Reynolds-number effects, it would also be beneficial to reevaluate the compressibility transformations at a high Reynolds number and to assess whether or not the existing compressibility transformations would perform better at higher Reynolds numbers. A recent study of compressible channel flows for bulk Mach numbers between 0.8 and 1.5 and bulk Reynolds numbers in the range 3000-34 000 by Yao & Hussain (2020) has found that the differences between incompressible and compressible flows (e.g. the increase in the streamwise Reynolds stress peak with increasing Mach number) become less prominent as the Reynolds number increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most successful MVT that accounts for the near-wall viscosity gradient was independently developed by Trettel et al (3) and Patel et al (7). However, despite their initial success in isothermal CTBL cases (15,16) with low semi-local Reynolds, Re * , the scaling remains unsuccessful for cases with increasing Re * where multiple studies (14,17) report a large scatter in the log layer intercept and the slope for such cases. Where Re * = Reτ ρ/ρw/(µ/µw), Reτ = ρwuτ δ/µw is the frictionvelocity based Reynolds number, ρ is density, uτ = τw/ρw is the friction-velocity, δ is the boundary layer thickness, τw = µ ∂u ∂z |w is the wall shear stress, µ is the dynamic viscosity, u is the streamwise velocity, and z is the wall normal coordinate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many aspects of the complex interactions between compressibility effects and turbulence structures are still not thoroughly understood. Traditional free shear layers (such as jets, wakes and mixing layers) and Poiseuille/Couette type flows (such as channel flows) have been utilized to study compressible turbulence [13,15,16]. Spatiallydeveloping mixing layer simulations are computationally expensive and are sensitive to farfield and inflow/outflow boundary conditions [16,17], but the basic compressibility effects are captured in temporal simulation as, for example, discussed by Vreman et al [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional free shear layers (such as jets, wakes and mixing layers) and Poiseuille/Couette type flows (such as channel flows) have been utilized to study compressible turbulence [13,15,16]. Spatiallydeveloping mixing layer simulations are computationally expensive and are sensitive to farfield and inflow/outflow boundary conditions [16,17], but the basic compressibility effects are captured in temporal simulation as, for example, discussed by Vreman et al [18]. A drawback of the temporal approach is that the shear layer thickens as time progresses and large structures rapidly fill the computational domain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%