Volume 1: Fora, Parts A, B, C, and D 2003
DOI: 10.1115/fedsm2003-45495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulence Structure of a Liquid-Solid Two-Phase Jet by Means of Laser Techniques

Abstract: Characteristics on particle motion in a liquid-solid two-phase jet flow were studied in the paper. The water jet including glass particle of 389 μm in mean diameter was injected into water bath. The experimental conditions were 0.21% of initial particle volume ratio, 5mm in pipe diameter and 1.84 m/s of mean velocity on outlet of the jet. A laser Doppler anemometer (LDA) with size discrimination was applied for measuring the time serious velocities of the single-phase flow, particle and water phase flow. A par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 that overall the difference between the dispersed phase and the single phase predictions is almost nil except a few regions near the inner shear layer at ɳ = 1.11. This is found to be consistent with the experimental observation by Arai et al [23], and later, Sadr and Klewicki [17], and Virdung and Rasmuson [8] wherein the effect of mass loading at 0.21% on the continuous phase was reported as insignificant. Figure 9 shows comparison of the axial turbulent intensity predicted along the radial direction with and without the dispersed phase.…”
Section: Two Phase Flowsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…8 that overall the difference between the dispersed phase and the single phase predictions is almost nil except a few regions near the inner shear layer at ɳ = 1.11. This is found to be consistent with the experimental observation by Arai et al [23], and later, Sadr and Klewicki [17], and Virdung and Rasmuson [8] wherein the effect of mass loading at 0.21% on the continuous phase was reported as insignificant. Figure 9 shows comparison of the axial turbulent intensity predicted along the radial direction with and without the dispersed phase.…”
Section: Two Phase Flowsupporting
confidence: 82%