2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2011.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulent boundary layer separation control and loss evaluation of low profile vortex generators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to a delta wing system (see, eg, Hoerner), a leading edge vortex develops along the vane and is shed near the tip, creating a wake of upwash and downwash regions. This re‐energizes the boundary layer with the outer flow and delays flow reversal (separation) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to a delta wing system (see, eg, Hoerner), a leading edge vortex develops along the vane and is shed near the tip, creating a wake of upwash and downwash regions. This re‐energizes the boundary layer with the outer flow and delays flow reversal (separation) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, passive flow control method can be executed by adding geometrical discontinuities. The active flow control methods can be suction and/or blowing [6] or high lift devices [7], the passive control methods can be vortex generators [8] or flexibility enhancer [9][10]. Lift can be increased, drag force can be reduced, stall can be delayed, vibrations and noise can be diminished and reattachment of the separated flow can be ensured by means of utilizing these flow control methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitatively speaking, these modifications promote an increased momentum thickness but reduce the displacement thickness. The shape factor decreases and the skin friction coefficient will increase . It is important to note that these trends may be skewed by the physical presence of the devices, which according to Schubauer and Spangenberg, cause local jumps in δ ∗ and θ that are amplified with the developing boundary layer.…”
Section: Approach and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Drela argues that VGs promote increased dissipation by introducing streamwise vortices into the boundary layer, which consequently increases the sustainable adverse pressure gradient. Lengani et al demonstrated this by analysing the dissipation mechanisms in a separating duct controlled by vane‐type vortex generators. Dissipation in this sense refers to the drain of mean flow kinetic energy through the action of the shear stress with the mean strain rate, essentially, through enhanced mixing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%