2020
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulent convection for different thermal boundary conditions at the plates

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, despite the fundamentally different long-living large-scale flow structures between the cases of applied constant temperatures and vertical temperature gradients (see again § 1), their response on a variation of the working fluid shares clear analogies: compare therefore the bright and dark markers in figure 4, respectively. Note here that while the Rayleigh number Ra D := αgΔTH 3 /(νκ) in case of an applied constant temperature difference ΔT, this is related via Ra D ≡ Ra/Nu (Otero et al 2002;Foroozani, Krasnov & Schumacher 2021;Vieweg et al 2021a) to (2.4a,b). In particular, this allows to relate the present Pr = 1 run to the corresponding no-slip and Ra D = 10 5 one from Pandey et al (2022) as described in Vieweg (2023).…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, despite the fundamentally different long-living large-scale flow structures between the cases of applied constant temperatures and vertical temperature gradients (see again § 1), their response on a variation of the working fluid shares clear analogies: compare therefore the bright and dark markers in figure 4, respectively. Note here that while the Rayleigh number Ra D := αgΔTH 3 /(νκ) in case of an applied constant temperature difference ΔT, this is related via Ra D ≡ Ra/Nu (Otero et al 2002;Foroozani, Krasnov & Schumacher 2021;Vieweg et al 2021a) to (2.4a,b). In particular, this allows to relate the present Pr = 1 run to the corresponding no-slip and Ra D = 10 5 one from Pandey et al (2022) as described in Vieweg (2023).…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past two decades, the SEM solver is involved in studies of thermal turbulent convection (Dong et al. 2020; Wang, Zhou & Sun 2020; Foroozani, Krasnov & Schumacher 2021; Zhao et al. 2022; Xu, Xu & Xi 2023), EC (Feng et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to specify the real boundary conditions in an exact way, all the more as the thickness of the lacquer layer might not be perfectly homogeneous. At any rate, one is most likely dealing with a mixture of constant temperature and constant heat flux boundary conditions (Foroozani, Krasnov & Schumacher 2021). This represents an intrinsic difference compared with experiments in high fluids, where, due to the significantly lower thermal conductivity, it is much easier to achieve small values for , and thus to get closer to the requirement for constant temperature boundary conditions on the copper plates.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%