2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5142294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulent drag reduction in magnetohydrodynamic and quasi-static magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

Abstract: In hydrodynamic turbulence, the kinetic energy injected at large scales cascades to the inertial range, leading to a constant kinetic energy flux. In contrast, in magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence, a fraction of kinetic energy is transferred to the magnetic energy. Consequently, for the same kinetic energy injection rate, the kinetic energy flux in MHD turbulence is reduced compared to its hydrodynamic counterpart. This leads to relative weakening of the nonlinear term ⟨|(u·∇)u|⟩, (where u is the velocity f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in decaying MHD turbulence, magnetic field feeds energy to the velocity field when b 2 u 2 and vice versa [152]. The cross energy transfer Π u< ζ (k) is also responsible for the drag reduction in MHD turbulence [43]. Since Π u< ζ (k) > 0, using Eq.…”
Section: Various Energy Fluxes Of Mhd Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in decaying MHD turbulence, magnetic field feeds energy to the velocity field when b 2 u 2 and vice versa [152]. The cross energy transfer Π u< ζ (k) is also responsible for the drag reduction in MHD turbulence [43]. Since Π u< ζ (k) > 0, using Eq.…”
Section: Various Energy Fluxes Of Mhd Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the kinetic energy spectrum, ∼k −0.73 , is steeper than the magnetic energy spectrum, ∼k −0.68 . This differential can be attributed to the energy transfer from the velocity field to the magnetic field [7]. We have compared our results with those from the past, e.g., observational works on solar wind [25,26] and numerical works [57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Numerical Results On the Energy Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In 3D hydrodynamic turbulence, the kinetic energy flux Π u < u > remains constant in inertial range and it is equal to the kinetic energy dissipation rate. This flux, however, is not constant in MHD turbulence [7]. However, the total energy transferred to the inertial range of the velocity field is dissipated by the viscous force.…”
Section: Energy Fluxes and Exact Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selfconsistent simulations extended to larger distances may tell us why only specific values of the drag coefficient C D and snowplow efficiency C S seemed applicable to the observed flow patterns. Also, some of our assumptions about geometric inertia effects (i.e., C A ) and even the quadratic nature of the drag may need to be revised in the light of new simulations (see, e.g., Maloney & Gallagher 2010;Verma et al 2020).…”
Section: Observational Constraints On Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%