1998
DOI: 10.3189/1998aog26-1-179-183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulent fluxes above the snow surface

Abstract: ABSTRACT. M eas urements of sensible-and latent-h eat fluxes under stable conditi ons a re rare. In order to obtain indirec t m eas urem ents of wrbulent fluxes, meteorolog ical data measured at the Col de Porte laboratory (1320 m a.s. l, France ) under very stabl e co nditions (cold, clear night with low wind ) a re used. Th e radi ative f1uxes are meas ured, th e conduction within the snowpack is calcu lated using the snow model Crocus and the turbulent fluxes are d etermined as a residual term of the surfac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The warm bias in ORCHIDEE is related to the underestimated snow albedo (section 4.3.1). The cold bias of ORCHIDEE‐ES is also found in other intermediate complexity snow models [e.g., Essery and Etchevers , ; Brown et al ., ] and may reflect the fact that the Monin‐Obukhov similarity theory implemented in these land surface models is unable to explain turbulent energy exchanges over snow and ice under stable atmospheric conditions [ Martin and Lejeune , ]. Even under stable atmospheric conditions, turbulence still exists and is characterized by intermittent bursts.…”
Section: Model Evaluation At the Col De Porte Site (1993–2011)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The warm bias in ORCHIDEE is related to the underestimated snow albedo (section 4.3.1). The cold bias of ORCHIDEE‐ES is also found in other intermediate complexity snow models [e.g., Essery and Etchevers , ; Brown et al ., ] and may reflect the fact that the Monin‐Obukhov similarity theory implemented in these land surface models is unable to explain turbulent energy exchanges over snow and ice under stable atmospheric conditions [ Martin and Lejeune , ]. Even under stable atmospheric conditions, turbulence still exists and is characterized by intermittent bursts.…”
Section: Model Evaluation At the Col De Porte Site (1993–2011)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these conditions SMAP assumes that turbulence ceases. To improve the model performance it can be effective to introduce a windless transfer coefficient employed in SNTHERM [ Jordan , 1991; Jordan et al , 1999; Andreas et al , 2004; Helgason and Pomeroy , 2011], or a modification formulation for bulk transfer coefficients implemented in CROCUS by Martin and Lejeune [1998] to ensure minimum heat exchanges even under very stable conditions. However, since they are quite empirical, they should be validated carefully through detailed micrometeorological observations such as turbulence measurements with the eddy covariance technique before introducing them to SMAP.…”
Section: Model Validation With Data From Sapporomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the spatial variability of snowmelt, however, is crucially important in order to distribute point measurements to broader scales, to validate distributed snowmelt models, and to accurately predict melt rates-especially in flood forecasting applications. Net shortwave and longwave radiation and the turbulent fluxes of sensible and latent heat are generally the most important components of the snowmelt EB, and these terms can be highly spatially variable owing to topography and vegetation (Martin and Lejeune 1998;Marks et al 1999;Pohl et al 2006a,b). The exchange of energy at the snow-atmosphere interface is most important for snowmelt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%