1988
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(88)85114-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulent mass transfer on a rotating disk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Besides, turbulence first occurs near the rim of the disk, the liquid flow at a small disk radius is then still laminar. 28 In the transition regime, the observed power in Re is 3.0, which describes the transition from laminar to turbulent flow and is thus not a fundamental property of the mass transfer mechanism, as is the value of 0.5 in laminar flow and the value of 0.9 in turbulent flow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Besides, turbulence first occurs near the rim of the disk, the liquid flow at a small disk radius is then still laminar. 28 In the transition regime, the observed power in Re is 3.0, which describes the transition from laminar to turbulent flow and is thus not a fundamental property of the mass transfer mechanism, as is the value of 0.5 in laminar flow and the value of 0.9 in turbulent flow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for wall-jet hydrodynamic electrodes [18] the transition to turbulent flow has been expressed in terms of the critical Reynolds number with 25 < Recritical < 1000 (with Re = where U is the velocity in ms -1 , l is the nozzle diameter in m, and v is the kinematic viscosity in m 2 s -1 ). Similarly, for the rotating disc electrode under high speed conditions [19] the transition to turbulent conditions is expected at Recritical = 3 × 10 5 [20,21]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Next, the Reynolds number was calculated to see if the high-speed rotating disk electrode operated under laminar or turbulent conditions, noting that eqs 1 and 2 presume laminar conditions. The Reynolds number was estimated via the following: The critical Reynolds number separating laminar from turbulent flow has been described as being Re c = 3 × 10 5 . , Using eq 3, the Reynolds number was found to be 658 (±32), which is below the Re c number, confirming that the HSRDE operates under a laminar flow regime.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%