2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.08.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulent opposed-jet flames: A critical benchmark experiment for combustion LES☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
91
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1), originally developed by Geyer et al [11], was extensively used by Geipel et al [10] and Goh et al [8,31,32,33] and is identical to the the configuration used by Hampp et al [22,23]. A cross fractal grid (CFG; [34]) was installed 50 mm upstream the UN exit, featuring a BR of 65 % with maximum and minimum bar widths of 2.0 mm and 0.50 mm.…”
Section: Methods Assumptions and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1), originally developed by Geyer et al [11], was extensively used by Geipel et al [10] and Goh et al [8,31,32,33] and is identical to the the configuration used by Hampp et al [22,23]. A cross fractal grid (CFG; [34]) was installed 50 mm upstream the UN exit, featuring a BR of 65 % with maximum and minimum bar widths of 2.0 mm and 0.50 mm.…”
Section: Methods Assumptions and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposed jet geometry has been extensively utilised to investigate turbulent (and laminar) non-premixed, partially premixed and premixed combustion as well as, more recently, regime transitions [6,7,8,9]. The geometry entails decisive advantages rendering it indispensable for experimental combustion studies as well as computational model development and validation [10,11]. These are: (i) Excellent optical access for laser-based diagnostic measurements; (ii) Accurate experimental control of boundary conditions; (iii) Aerodynamic flame stabilisation, rather than through pilot flames, leading to flame dynamics and extinction being directly related to the intrinsic aerothermochemistry of the combustion process; (iv) Individual control of variables affecting the chemical and turbulent time-scale and (v) a compact physical domain ideal for LES and other computational studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposed jet geometry has been extensively utilised to investigate -laminar as well as turbulent -non-premixed, partial premixed, and premixed combustion and, more recently, combustion regime transitions for aviation fuels (Goh et al 2013b). The configuration has notable advantages for combustion studies (Mastorakos et al 1995, Geyer et al 2005, Geipel et al 2010): (i) excellent optical access for laser-based diagnostic measurements, (ii) accurate experimental control of boundary conditions, (iii) aerodynamic flame stabilisation, rather than via pilot flames, leading to flame dynamics and extinction being related to the inherent aerothermochemistry of the combustion process; and (iv) individual control of variables affecting the chemical and turbulent time-scale. The last two points identify the facility as ideal for investigations of combustion regime transitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposed jet geometry used as a starting point in the current work consists of two nozzles in a vertical arrangement originally designed by Geyer et al [5,31] and is identical to that described by Geipel et al [6]. Both nozzles were water-cooled to prevent differences in the reactant densities due to preheating.…”
Section: Experimental Configuration Techniques and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparatively simple flame stabilisation method and essentially adiabatic conditions lead to flame dynamics and extinction being related to the aerothermochemistry of the combustion process rather than heat losses. Combined with the comparatively simple boundary conditions, the opposed jet geometry provides an attractive standard test case for the assessment of fuel effects and closure approximations as proposed by Bray et al [1], Lindstedt and Váos [2,3] and subsequently by Geyer et al [4,5] in the context of large eddy simulations (LES). Preparatory isothermal flow studies have also been presented by a number of investigators (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%