2015
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2015.401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection in spherical shells

Abstract: We simulate numerically Boussinesq convection in non-rotating spherical shells for a fluid with a unity Prandtl number and Rayleigh numbers up to 10 9 . In this geometry, curvature and radial variations of the gravitational acceleration yield asymmetric boundary layers. A systematic parameter study for various radius ratios (from η = r i /r o = 0.2 to η = 0.95) and gravity profiles allows us to explore the dependence of the asymmetry on these parameters. We find that the average plume spacing is comparable bet… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
108
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
8
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scaling appears as a common feature of high-Ra convection in the laboratory setup (see e.g., Ahlers et al 2009 and references therein). Moreover, Boussinesq studies carried out using spherical geometry and symmetric, fixed-temperature boundary conditions (in lieu of internal heating) have demonstrated a similar scaling relationship (Gastine et al 2015).…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Kinetic-energy Scalingmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This scaling appears as a common feature of high-Ra convection in the laboratory setup (see e.g., Ahlers et al 2009 and references therein). Moreover, Boussinesq studies carried out using spherical geometry and symmetric, fixed-temperature boundary conditions (in lieu of internal heating) have demonstrated a similar scaling relationship (Gastine et al 2015).…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Kinetic-energy Scalingmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It can be argued that these two systems, disparate in terms of geometry and Rm o values, cannot be meaningfully related (cf. [29]). However, this intercomparison is ubiquitously made in the dynamo literature when considerations of magnetostrophic balance are put forth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with a scaling exponent that is approximately 2/7 (∼ 0.286). Other studies have found that the Nusselt number scales with the Rayleigh number to the 2/9 power (∼ 0.222) (e.g., Gastine et al 2015), when a flux based Rayleigh number is used. Our results have a steeper exponent because we include the viscous flux and the kinetic energy flux, which act to increase 1/ (1 − f conv ) at any given Rayleigh number.…”
Section: Energy Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%