Turbulent Transition and Organizational Chance: Relating Policy Outcomes to Strategic Administrative Capacities

Abstract

Much of the literature on public policy with its institutional and legislative emphases conveys the view that organizational effectiveness is primarily dependent on actors external to the agency. That is, laws prescribe programs and operating procedures; overlapping jurisdictions restrict innovative behavior; and the politics o f fund budgeting encourage complacency and incrementalism. This article proposes an alternative set of propositions explaining policy outcomes and agency performance as a function of internal administrative considerations. The propositions are empirically evaluated using data from Pacific Coast port authorities during the "container revolution" and environmental movement. The results suggest that variance in strategic performance can be attributed to (1) perceptions about intergovernmental relations and performance gap, (2) an agency micro-structure for strategic planning and policy analysis, and (3) a set of intervening administrative variables. Copyright 1988 by The Policy Studies Organization.

International Economic Integration and Environmental Protection: The Case of China

“…Personnel: The number of personnel charged with enforcement of environmental laws and regulations is another factor that may potentially affect environmental enforcement capacities. Previous research (e.g., Boschken 1988) has shown that administrative capacity has an important bearing on policy outcomes. It is conceivable that more environmental enforcement personnel may help strengthen environmental protection; conversely, the lower the ratio of enforcement personnel in a province’s population, the less likely a province will be to engage in effective oversight of environmental rules and regulation.…”

How do public hospitals respond to environmental change? Evidence from Thailand

“…Public organisations are much more likely to have strategy content imposed on them because they are more likely than private firms to be subject to pressures of coercive isomorphism (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983) that influence their strategic orientation. Regulatory instruments wielded by governments including performance indicators, planning systems, inspection, audit, budgetary controls, and annual reports (Ashworth et al, 2002) can constrain public organisation's strategy by placing actual limits on strategic decisions and by inhibiting 'entrepreneurial' behaviour by public managers who may constantly have to consider whether new strategies will be acceptable to their regulators (Boschken, 1988).…”

Global Cities Are Coastal Cities Too: Paradox in Sustainability?

“…a global gateway for international transport including air passenger travel (Mahutga, et al, 2010; Derudder and Witlox, 2005) and maritime trade (Jacobs et al , 2011; Verhetsel and Sel, 2009; Boschken, 1988); and…”

“…By contrast, the potential significance of post-WWII seaports and a globalised UMC are often understated or overlooked in relevant literatures. Little attention to impacts of urban containerised seaports is found in either the global cities literature (for partial exceptions, see Jacobs et al , 2011; Verhetsel and Sel, 2009) or the environmental sustainability literature (for exceptions, see Cannon, 2008; Boschken, 1988). Impacts from UMC lifestyle have received virtually no attention in global cities research and only marginal attention in environmental sustainability (for exceptions, see Clement, 2010; Wheeler, 2009; McGranahan and Satterthwaite, 2003).…”

“…Contemporary globalisation is rooted in the ability to move a huge tonnage of goods swiftly around the world at a scale and efficiency that renders cost per unit of transport minimal or insignificant in the final per-unit cost of goods sold (Boschken, 1998; Levinson, 2006). To make these efficiencies possible, transformational technologies in ship design and seaport terminals emerged in the late 1960s and 1970s that revolutionised maritime shipping by transporting goods in large salt-resistant metal containers (Boschken, 1988).…”