2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29694-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turing Test as a Defining Feature of AI-Completeness

Abstract: Abstract. The paper contributes to the development of the theory of AICompleteness by formalizing the notion of AI-Complete and AI-Hard problems. The intended goal is to provide a classification of problems in the field of General Artificial Intelligence. We prove Turing Test to be an instance of an AI-Complete problem and further show certain AI problems to be AI-Complete or AI-Hard via polynomial time reductions. Finally, the paper suggests some directions for future work on the theory of AI-Completeness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, the problem of creating RSI software is really the challenge of creating a program capable of writing other programs [64], and so is an AI-Complete problem as has been demonstrated by Yampolskiy [65,66]. AI-complete problems are by definition most difficult problems faced by AI researchers and it is likely that RSI source code will be so complex that it would be difficult or impossible to fully analyze [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, the problem of creating RSI software is really the challenge of creating a program capable of writing other programs [64], and so is an AI-Complete problem as has been demonstrated by Yampolskiy [65,66]. AI-complete problems are by definition most difficult problems faced by AI researchers and it is likely that RSI source code will be so complex that it would be difficult or impossible to fully analyze [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We still don't know the minimum intelligence necessary for commencing the RSI process, but we can speculate that it would be on par with human intelligence which we associate with universal or general intelligence [38], though in principal a sub-human level system capable of self-improvement can't be excluded [30]. One may argue that even human level capability is not enough because we already have programmers (people or their intellectual equivalence formalized as functions [39] or Human Oracles [40,41]) who have access to their own source code (DNA), but who fail to understand how DNA (nature) works to create their intelligence. This doesn't even include additional complexity in trying to improve on existing DNA code or complicating factors presented by the impact of learning environment (nurture) on development of human intelligence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, the problem of creating RSI software is really the challenge of creating a program capable of writing other programs [64], and so is an AI-Complete problem as has been demonstrated by Yampolskiy [65,66]. More precisely, the problem of creating RSI software is really the challenge of creating a program capable of writing other programs [64], and so is an AI-Complete problem as has been demonstrated by Yampolskiy [65,66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%