2020
DOI: 10.16916/aded.718809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Türkçe Öğretmeni Adaylarının Dinlediklerinden Hareketle Hazırlıksız Konuşma Başarıları: Karma Yöntem Araştırması

Abstract: Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının dinlediklerinden hareketle yaptıkları hazırlıksız konuşma başarılarını belirlemektir. Karma yöntemin kullanıldığı araştırma, açımlayıcı desene dayanmaktadır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu, Adıyaman Üniversitesinde 2019-2020 eğitimöğretim yılında öğrenim gören Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarıdır. Kolay ulaşılabilir örneklemin kullanıldığı araştırmanın nicel veri toplama aracı, Konuşma Becerisi Derecelendirme Ölçeği ve Konuşma Becerisi Gözlem Formu'dur. Araştırmanı… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some pre-service teachers emphasized this situation by thinking aloud about what they could tell and what more they could add in their speech. This result of the current study is similar to the result of Kiymaz and Doyumgac (2020) stating that pre-service teachers included unnecessary repetitions in their impromptu speeches. In their study, Safdari and Fathi (2020) revealed that university students reduced their mistakes in speech and developed a more fluent speech as a result of a dynamic evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some pre-service teachers emphasized this situation by thinking aloud about what they could tell and what more they could add in their speech. This result of the current study is similar to the result of Kiymaz and Doyumgac (2020) stating that pre-service teachers included unnecessary repetitions in their impromptu speeches. In their study, Safdari and Fathi (2020) revealed that university students reduced their mistakes in speech and developed a more fluent speech as a result of a dynamic evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There are also technology-assisted impromptu speech studies (Butler, 2017;Hung & Huang, 2016;Lohmander et al, 2021) and studies investigating university students' state of anxiety about speaking in public while addressing the language learning processes (Hunter et al, 2014;LeFebvre et al, 2018LeFebvre et al, , 2020Nash et al, 2016). Moreover, in addition to studies where impromptu speech skills are developed by applying certain techniques (Bulut et al, 2016;Kuru, 2017), there are studies where impromptu speech skills are measured and evaluated (Hansen, 2016;Iberri-Shea, 2017;Kiymaz & Doyumgac, 2020;LeFebvre et al, 2015;Schneider & Bodensohn, 2017;Schreiber et al, 2012;Yuceer, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dinleme, sözlü anlama; konuşma ise sözlü anlatma olarak değerlendirilmektedir." (Kıymaz ve Doyumğaç, 2020a: 1050. Bu yüzden konuşma/k ve dinleme/k sözlü iletişim biçimleri olarak kabul edilmekte ve birbirini tamamlayan iki beceri olarak değerlendirilmektedir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified