Turkish health system reform from the people’s perspective: a cross sectional study

Abstract

BackgroundSince 2003, Turkey has implemented major health care reforms to develop easily accessible, high-quality, efficient, and effective healthcare services for the population. The purpose of this study was to bring out opinions of the Turkish people on health system reform process, focusing on several aspects of health system and assessing whether the public prefer the current health system or that provided a decade ago.MethodsA cross sectional survey study was carried out in Turkey to collect data on people’s opinions on the healthcare reforms. Data was collected via self administered household’s structured questionnaire. A five-point Likert-type scale was used to score the closed comparative statements. Each statement had response categories ranging from (1) “strongly agree” to (5) “strongly disagree.” A total of 482 heads of households (response rate: 71.7%) with the mean age of (46.60 years) were selected using a multi stage sampling technique from seven geographical regions in Turkey from October 2011 to January 2012. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to identify significant contributing factors in this study.ResultsEmploying descriptive statistics it is observed that among the respondents, more than two third of the population believes that the changes have had positive effects on the health system. A vast majority of respondents (82.0%) believed that there was an increase in accessibility, 73.7% thought more availability of health resources, 72.6% alleged improved quality of care, and 72.6% believed better attitude of politician/mass media due to the changes in the last 10 years. Indeed, the majority of respondents (77.6%) prefer the current health care system than the past. In multivariate analysis, there was a statistically significant relationship between characteristics and opinions of the respondents. The elderly, married females, perceived themselves healthy and those who believe that people are happier now than 10 years ago have a more positive opinion of the changes. While, the single unemployed from rural region who perceived themselves as unhealthy and believe that people are unhappy now compare to ten years ago showed less positive opinions.ConclusionsHence, we conclude that from the people’s perspective overall the health system reforms were most likely successful.

The Auditing of General Practitioner Offices in Tabriz City to Assess Their Compliance with National Licensure Standards

“…Also, the GPs with experience of less than ten years had better medical and non-medical devices compared to GPs with 11 to 15 years of job experience (P = 0.042). The standards compliance in physical environment dimension in urban district 1 was better than district 6; urban district 2 better than most urban districts (9,8,7,6,5,3,10); and urban district 4 better than urban district 6. In addition, urban district 1 had better medical and non-medical devices than district 6; urban district 2 than most of urban districts (9,8,7,6,5,3,10); and district 4 than district 6 (P < 0.05).…”

Iranian Health Reform Advantages in Health Care System: A Qualitative Study

“…In Turkey, the Health Reform Plan has been implemented since 2003 to develop easy access and provide high quality, effective, and efficient care for the people. From the viewpoint of Turkish people, the Health Reform Plan had positive results including increased access of people, decreased inequity in receiving health services, and decreased costs (3).…”

“…To increase efficiency, in 2004, payment based on performance was executed at all the hospitals and health care centers. The health information system was qualified and changed into a case-combined system, which would lead to more efficient use of the resources (3). In Korea, the national health insurance program was emphasized on the payment method to health care providers and price modification (4).…”

Knowledge of Primary Care Physicians About Breast-Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Turkish Perspective

“…However, after health care transition, a new primary care scheme was introduced to cover the entire population and accessibility to health care services increased [23]. As the result of this condition, primary care became main contact point for surveillance of patients with chronic diseases including breast cancer.…”