2012
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-6091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turkish Treasury Simulation Model for Debt Strategy Analysis

Abstract: The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the purpose of the model is to help the Hungarian Government Debt Management Agency in creating a medium term (5 years) debt management strategy.Several countries have developed stochastic optimal portfolio models for debt management purposes. Notable examples include Canada (Bolder and Deeley, 2011), Italy (Adamo et al, 2004;Consiglio and Staino, 2012), Sweden (Bergström et al, 2002), Turkey (Balibek and Memis, 2012) and the United Kingdom (Pick and Anthony, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the purpose of the model is to help the Hungarian Government Debt Management Agency in creating a medium term (5 years) debt management strategy.Several countries have developed stochastic optimal portfolio models for debt management purposes. Notable examples include Canada (Bolder and Deeley, 2011), Italy (Adamo et al, 2004;Consiglio and Staino, 2012), Sweden (Bergström et al, 2002), Turkey (Balibek and Memis, 2012) and the United Kingdom (Pick and Anthony, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%