2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-019-10035-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turkish Version of the Mastication Observation and Evaluation (MOE) Instrument: A Reliability and Validity Study in Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results show that as oral health deteriorates in children, disruptions occur in oral motor behaviours necessary for efficient chewing, resulting in worse chewing performance. On the other hand, the median T‐MOE scores of children with s‐ECC groups in our study were lower than reported in the study by Serel et al 19 . for healthy children but higher than in children with cerebral palsy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results show that as oral health deteriorates in children, disruptions occur in oral motor behaviours necessary for efficient chewing, resulting in worse chewing performance. On the other hand, the median T‐MOE scores of children with s‐ECC groups in our study were lower than reported in the study by Serel et al 19 . for healthy children but higher than in children with cerebral palsy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…It has often been used in adults 28,29 . Two valid, reliable, clinically easy‐to‐use instruments are reported in the literature, which mainly focus on chewing function, benefit from standard scoring, complement each other and together provide a holistic approach; T‐MOE 19 and the KCPS 18 . While the KCPS shows the levels of chewing performance according to the sequence of oral movements during chewing, the MOE encompasses variety factors that are fundamental to chewing function, including movement of the lips, tongue and jaw, chewing duration, loss of food or saliva, number of swallows, and coordination of swallowing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dentro de la revisión de diferentes estudios en deglución pediátrica se evidencia gran diversidad de herramientas clínicas para realizar la evaluación de distintos aspectos relacionados con este proceso: Screening tool for feeding problems (Herramienta de Detección de Problemas de Alimentación) (STEP) (Matsona y Kuhn, 2001); The Montreal Children's Hospital Feeding Scale (Escala de alimentación del Montreal Children's Hospital) (Ramsay et al, 2011); The Pediatric Version of the Eating Assessment Tool (La versión pediátrica de la herramienta de evaluación de la alimentación) (PEDI -EAT -10) (Serel et al, 2017); The Pediatric assessment scale for severe feeding problems (La escala de evaluación pediátrica para problemas severos de alimentación) (PASSFP) (Crist et al, 2004); The Children's Eating Behavior Inventory (El inventario de Comportamiento Alimentario de los Niños) (CEBI) (Archer et al, 1991); The Behavioural Pediatric Feeding Assessment Scale (Escala de Evaluación de la Alimentación Pediátrica del Comportamiento) (BPFAS) (Crist y Napier-Phillips, 2001); The Mastication Observation and Evaluation (Instrumento para la observación y evaluación de la masticación) (MOE) (Remijn et al, 2013;Serel et al, 2019), Schedule for Oral-Motor Assessment (Programa de evaluación motora -oral) (SOMA) (Skuse et al, 1995); entre otros.…”
unclassified