2007
DOI: 10.31671/dogus.2019.243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Türkiye de Ekonomik Büyüme ile Elektrik Tüketimi İlişkisi: Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı

Abstract: Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'de ekonomik büyüme ile elektrik tüketimi ilişkisi 1974-2004 dönemi için incelenmiştir. Ekonomik büyüme ve elektrik tüketimi serileri farklı derecelerden durağan (I(0) ve I(1)) oldukları için aralarındaki ilişki Sınır Testi yaklaşımı ile araştırılmıştır. Bu yaklaşıma göre, seriler arasında eşbütünleşme ilişkisi tespit edilmiş ve kısa dönemde değişkenler arasında pozitif bir ilişki ortaya çıkarken uzun dönemde bu ilişki negatif çıkmıştır.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…If the estimated F-statistics is lower than the bottom bound of critical values, there is no co-integration relationship between the series (Narayan & Narayan, 2004). If the calculated F-statistics is between the bottom and upper critical values, no exact opinion can be made (Karagol, Erbaykal, & Ertugrul, 2007).…”
Section: Bound Test Co-integration Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the estimated F-statistics is lower than the bottom bound of critical values, there is no co-integration relationship between the series (Narayan & Narayan, 2004). If the calculated F-statistics is between the bottom and upper critical values, no exact opinion can be made (Karagol, Erbaykal, & Ertugrul, 2007).…”
Section: Bound Test Co-integration Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engle-Granger's cointegration method revealed a long-term relationship between these two variables. Yamak and Güngör (1998) study of the period 1951-1994, Bakirtaş et al (2000 the period of 1962-1996, Sarı, Soytaş and Özdemir (2001) of the period of 1960-1995, Nişancı (2005 of the period of 1970, Erdoğdu (2006 of the period of 1984-2004, Halıcıoğlu (2007 of the period of 1968-2005, Karagöl, Erbaykal and Ertuğrul (2007) discussed the 1974-2000 period in their studies. In Turkey, between 1980-2000, economic growth increased by 4%, electricity consumption increased on average by 8%.…”
Section: Current Literaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While electricity consumption per capita has been 452 kWh since 1980, this figure was 1687 kWh in 2004 but compared to 8600 kWh, which is the average of OECD countries. (Karagöl et al, 2007) The common finding of all the studies in this field is that there is a long-term relationship between the consumption of residential and industrial electricity and economic growth. The fact that electrical energy consumption in the industry has started to increase with economic growth only shows that the relationship between electrical energy consumption and economic growth in residential areas is a two-way causality relationship.…”
Section: Current Literaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the calculated F-statistic is lower than the bottom bound of critical values, we conclude that there is no co-integration between the variables. However, if the calculated F-statistic remains between the two bounds, we cannot make a certain judgment (Erdal Karagöl, Erman Erbaykal, and Ertuğrul 2007). For our UECM model, we employ the Akaike and Schwarz information criteria to determine the appropriate lag number.…”
Section: The Bounds Test Co-integration Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%