PsycEXTRA Dataset 2011
DOI: 10.1037/e537112012-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turnaround Schools in California: Who Are They and What Strategies Do They Use?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among our seminal reports, only Aladjem and colleagues (2010) give parent involvement and engagement significant play and regularly cite it as an important factor in student learning. In line with these findings, researchers who interviewed 9 successful turnaround principals in California found that 4 of them had focused on "increased parental involvement" as a key school improvement strategy (Huberman et al, 2011).…”
Section: Urban Education 49(1)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Among our seminal reports, only Aladjem and colleagues (2010) give parent involvement and engagement significant play and regularly cite it as an important factor in student learning. In line with these findings, researchers who interviewed 9 successful turnaround principals in California found that 4 of them had focused on "increased parental involvement" as a key school improvement strategy (Huberman et al, 2011).…”
Section: Urban Education 49(1)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For instance, how are the processes for using data to drive instruction in elementary schools different from secondary schools? Are there additional challenges in implementing data-use initiatives in schools or districts that are low performing or engaged in “turnaround” work (Calkins, Guenther, Belfiore, & Lash, 2007; Huberman et al, 2011)?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data use can also be a tool for achieving larger organizational goals (Supovitz & Klein, 2003) and help to create a “culture of inquiry,” one which supports open communication of stakeholder groups (Earl & Katz, 2002). On the other hand, there has been minimal causal evidence that data use leads to improvements in student achievement or in turning around low-performing schools (Hamilton et al, 2009; Herman et al, 2008; Huberman et al, 2011). The authors of these systematic reviews noted that the minimal evidence was largely due to the kinds of studies that exist on data use.…”
Section: Understanding the System’s Role In Data-use Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While more recent versions of the school turnaround concept preserved San Francisco's emphasis on transforming the nature of leadership and teaching in reconstituted schools, and, in the case of SIG-funded schools, increased financial resources to do so, they lacked entirely the early effort to promote desegregation-let alone the systemic desegregation that characterized San Francisco's initial reconstitution work. Indeed, nearly all recent turnaround efforts are taking place in the context of trying to make separate schools equal in terms of student achievement (Huberman, Parrish, Hannan, Arellanes, & Shambaugh, 2011;Miller & Brown, 2015).…”
Section: Magnet School Turnarounds In Historical Context: the Case Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%