2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2015.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turning a disadvantage into a resource: Working at the periphery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Working from the periphery may constitute an advantage (Zilber, 2015) but the negligible amount of papers from Eastern Europe appearing on the pages of the major global management journals suggest that it is more often a liability. This paper contributes to the understanding of the nature of disadvantages associated with working from the periphery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working from the periphery may constitute an advantage (Zilber, 2015) but the negligible amount of papers from Eastern Europe appearing on the pages of the major global management journals suggest that it is more often a liability. This paper contributes to the understanding of the nature of disadvantages associated with working from the periphery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, in recent years there has been a body of research in the tradition of the sociology of knowledge in management and organization studies that may be explored thematically, highlighting the diverse issues involved in the various stages in the production of scientific knowledge. These explorations include the philosophy and politics of the paradigmatic basis of organization and management theory (Amis & Silk, 2008;Astley, 1985); the limits and problematics of the peer review process (Abu-Saad, 2008;Bedeian, 2004;Burgess & Shaw, 2010;Strang & Siller, 2015;; the dynamics of writing and publishing (Cetro, Sirmon & Brymer, 2010;Cummings & Frost, 1985;de Rond & Miller, 2005;Golden-Biddle & Locke, 1993;Locke & Golden-Biddle, 1997;Macdonald & Kam, 2007); the interrelations between methodological tools and theoretical conceptualizations (Nord, 2012;Reay & Jones, 2016;Schneiberg & Clemens, 2006); the transformations and cross-disciplinary diffusion of theoretical concepts (Bartunek & Spreitzer, 2006;Bort & Kieser, 2011;Oswick, Fleming & Hanlon, 2011;Sahlin-Andersson & Engwall, 2002;Whetten, Felin & King, 2009); the ways theorizing takes place (Klag & Langley, 2013;Langley, 1999); the way theories are actually used (Glynn, Barr & Dacin, 2000; Golden-Biddle, Locke & Reay, 2006;Judge et al, 2007;Zupic & Cater, 2015); and, the tensions between North American and European scientific communities and practices (Battilana, Anteby & Sengul, 2010;Grey, 2010;Usdiken & Pasadoes, 1995;Zilber, 2015).…”
Section: The Sociology Of Organizational Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%