2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.83.063509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turning off the lights: How dark is dark matter?

Abstract: We consider current observational constraints on the electromagnetic charge of dark matter. The velocity dependence of the scattering cross-section through the photon gives rise to qualitatively different constraints than standard dark matter scattering through massive force carriers. In particular, recombination epoch observations of dark matter density perturbations require that ǫ, the ratio of the dark matter to electronic charge, is less than 10 −6 for m X = 1 GeV, rising to ǫ < 10 −4 for m X = 10 TeV. Tho… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
284
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(98 reference statements)
6
284
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We will see that this bound already excludes an observable γ-ray line for these cases (hence a fortiori when the direct detection bounds are stronger, this is even more excluded). Note also that all these direct detection constraints assume a standard local DM density, which might not apply depending on how large the DM particle millicharge is, because it can be shielded by galactic magnetic fields [22,25]. For instance, when Q em > 10 −10 · (m DM /100 GeV), the depletion of the local DM relic density from magnetic shielding begins to be sizeable, therefore weakening the direct detection bounds.…”
Section: Jhep08(2014)133mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will see that this bound already excludes an observable γ-ray line for these cases (hence a fortiori when the direct detection bounds are stronger, this is even more excluded). Note also that all these direct detection constraints assume a standard local DM density, which might not apply depending on how large the DM particle millicharge is, because it can be shielded by galactic magnetic fields [22,25]. For instance, when Q em > 10 −10 · (m DM /100 GeV), the depletion of the local DM relic density from magnetic shielding begins to be sizeable, therefore weakening the direct detection bounds.…”
Section: Jhep08(2014)133mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional DM-baryon interaction such as the one provided by a millicharge modifies this picture by rendering DM effectively "baryonic". This affects the CMB power spectrum as well as the baryon acoustic oscillations, leading to the upper bound [20][21][22][23] σ…”
Section: Jhep08(2014)133mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Millicharged dark matter can exchange photons with the nuclei and therefore constraints on ǫ can arise. Such constraints have been studied in the context of mirror dark matter [50] and in general [51]. In principle such a constraint might be quite severe.…”
Section: A Direct Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course sufficiently small values of ǫ lead to little scattering and thus particles will avoid detection. Based on the CDMS data, the analysis of [51] provided an upper bound ǫ ≃ 10 −8 for millicharged dark matter with mass above 10 GeV, provided that millicharged particles are not evacuated from the galactic disc. This limit is of course evaded by our decaying dark pion with an ǫ ∼ 10 −12 , but it could exclude the thermally produced dark pion that requires ǫ ∼ 10 −5 .…”
Section: A Direct Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such features occur when dark matter annihilates into a two-particle final state, with one of the particles a photon. Since dark matter must be electrically neutral (to good approximation [3]), such a signal is typically expected to be rather smaller than the expected annihilation cross section of a thermal relic, σv ∼ 3 × 10 −26 cm 2 /s (with mild dependence on the dark matter mass [4]). Nonetheless, such a gamma ray line is a very distinctive signal, unlikely to be faked by astrophysical backgrounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%