2021
DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2021.1.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turning Tail Risks into Tailwinds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Sharpe ratio is the ratio of excess returns to annualized volatility. CVaR is the conditional value-at-risk for a quantile of [ 2 ]. Max drawdown is the maximum observed loss from peak to trough as a percentage of peak value [ 44 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Sharpe ratio is the ratio of excess returns to annualized volatility. CVaR is the conditional value-at-risk for a quantile of [ 2 ]. Max drawdown is the maximum observed loss from peak to trough as a percentage of peak value [ 44 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volatility and downside volatility are deviation measures [ 22 ]. Conditional value-at-risk [ 23 ] and the power-spectrum measure [ 2 ] are spectral risk measures [ 24 ] that can be applied to risk parity portfolios after proper centering. See [ 2 ] for a review of tail-risk measures and their application to risk parity portfolios with and without dependencies.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Measures, such as VaR and CVaR, that focus on tail-risk became very popular as the result of the need to understand exposure to loss under 'extreme' market events. (See Gava et al (2021) for a recent study demonstrating that consideration of tail risk can suc-cessfully reduce sharp losses in multi-asset portfolios). However VaR has undesirable mathematical characteristics; except when the underlying random process is Gaussian, VaR is not a coherent risk measure as it lacks the properties of subadditivity and convexity (Artzner et al 1999).…”
Section: Description Of the Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%