2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turning textile waste into valuable yarn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others performed a life-cycle assessment of textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane [ 16 ]. In terms of waste, a promising outcome was also revealed [ 17 ]. The authors concluded that 100% of textile waste can be used for making yarn, in order to reduce environmental impact and to achieve a product at a low cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others performed a life-cycle assessment of textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane [ 16 ]. In terms of waste, a promising outcome was also revealed [ 17 ]. The authors concluded that 100% of textile waste can be used for making yarn, in order to reduce environmental impact and to achieve a product at a low cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANOVA statistical procedures were used to assess fiber and yarn properties. A Tukey HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) analysis confirmed the degree of significance [13] of the relationship between the waste types and fiber. By systematically varying yarn counts [14,16] and by systematically varying the fabric cover factor, the mechanical, comfort, and hand properties of fine cotton fabrics were examined.…”
Section: Observation In Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Due to the fact that the threads of the feather are of low tension, the length of the feather varies from one to another. The first reason for the unevenness of the length of the hair in terms of height is the unevenness of the linear density of the threads of the body and the back (Özdil et al, 2007;Jamshaid et al, 2021;Gong, 2015).…”
Section: Figure 3 Diagram Of Sample 2 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%