Turning the Immigration Policy Paradox Upside Down? Populist Liberalism and Discursive Gaps in South America

Abstract

A paradox of officially rejecting but covertly accepting irregular migrants has long been identified in the immigration policies of Western immigrant receiving states. In South America, on the other hand, a liberal discourse of universally welcoming all immigrants, irrespective of their origin and migratory status, has replaced the formally restrictive, securitized and not seldomly ethnically selective immigration rhetoric. This discursive liberalization has found partial translation into immigration laws and policies, but contrary to the universality of rights claimed in their discourses, governments reject recently increasing irregular south–south migration from Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean to varying degrees. This paper applies a mixed methodological approach of discourse and legal analysis and process tracing to explore in how far recent immigration policies in South America constitute a liberal turn, or rather a reverse immigration policy paradox of officially welcoming but covertly rejecting irregular migrants. Based on the comparative analysis of Argentina, Brazil and Ecuador, the study identifies and explains South American “populist liberalism” in the sphere of migration. We highlight important implications for migration theory, thereby opening up new avenues of research on immigration policy making outside Western liberal democracies, and particularly in predominantly migrant sending countries.

Political and Legal Responses to Human Mobility in South America in the Context of the Covid-19 Crisis. More Fuel for the Fire?

“…The sources for this article are national and regional legislation, statistics for migration and mobility, and specialized literature. This also builds from the authors' previous work on South American migration governance (Acosta and Freier, 2015;Brumat and Acosta, 2019;Brumat, 2020a;Acosta, 2018).…”

Managing labour migration in Malaysia: foreign workers and the challenges of ‘control’ beyond liberal democracies

“…However, it should be noted that such claims are not universal. Research from South America has suggested that liberalness can indeed extend from political systems to immigration policy (Arcarazo and Freier 2015). Within Africa, research has highlighted the complex interactions between migration (both inward and outward) and state development and formation (Vigneswaran and Quirk 2015).…”

The Migration State in the Global South: Nationalizing, Developmental, and Neoliberal Models of Migration Management

“…In addition, a strand of literature examines citizenship and membership regimes across the Global South (Whitaker 2005;Sadiq 2008;Chung 2010a;Kim 2016). There is also a range of important work on labor migrants' role in the politics and economies of the Arab world (Chaudhry 1997;Chalcraft 2009); policymaking in South Africa (Klotz 2013), Latin America (Arcarazo & Freier 2015), and Asia (Lie 2008;Chung 2010b); and regional migration systems in Asia and elsewhere (McKeown 2008; see also sections of various collections, e.g., Castles, Miller, and De Haas 2014;Geddes et al 2019). Finally, there is an emerging literature on "South-South migration" which focuses on transit and host states in the Global South in an effort to move beyond conventional expectations of migration from poorer to richer countries in Europe and North America (Nawyn 2016;Short, Hossain, and Khan 2017;Fiddian-Qasmiyeh 2018).…”