2009
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2009.41331075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turnover Contagion: How Coworkers' Job Embeddedness and Job Search Behaviors Influence Quitting

Abstract: This research developed and tested a model of turnover contagion in which the job embeddedness and job search behaviors of coworkers influence employees' decisions to quit. In a sample of 45 branches of a regional bank and 1,038 departments of a national hospitality firm, multilevel analysis revealed that coworkers' job embeddedness and job search behaviors explain variance in individual "voluntary turnover" over and above that explained by other individual and group-level predictors. Broadly speaking, these r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
482
5
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 477 publications
(507 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
14
482
5
6
Order By: Relevance
“…13 − .26) and all constructs except experience concentration significantly related to turnover. Given these differences across antecedent classes, factors pertaining to employee attachment to jobs and firms (e.g., see Felps et al, 2009;Mitchell et al, 2001)-as opposed or in addition to those pertaining to opportunity to leave-emerge as particularly important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13 − .26) and all constructs except experience concentration significantly related to turnover. Given these differences across antecedent classes, factors pertaining to employee attachment to jobs and firms (e.g., see Felps et al, 2009;Mitchell et al, 2001)-as opposed or in addition to those pertaining to opportunity to leave-emerge as particularly important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When attitudes and perceptions are sufficiently shared (as research indicates is often the case due to social contagion and exposure to similar work environments; Felps et al, 2009;Ryan et al, 1996;Whitman et al, 2010), these constructs may signal a collective-level desirability of movement that is analogous to the concept most often found at the individual level (and most often indexed as job satisfaction; Mobley, 1982). Positive shared attitudes and perceptions signal that members derive benefits (e.g., working in a committed team) that would be foregone through leaving, whereas negative views, especially those that are shared, become a common topic of discussion among members (Felps et al, 2009), inducing employees to look elsewhere for more satisfying work. We include four constructs as indicators of shared attitudes toward the job or organization-satisfaction, commitment, justice, and turnover intentions-and predict the following: Hypothesis 3: Unit-level commitment, justice, and satisfaction will be negatively related to collective turnover; unit-level turnover intentions will be positively related to collective turnover.…”
Section: Shared Attitudes Toward the Job And Organization Numerous Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To help eliminate potentially spurious relationships between our independent variable (authentic leadership), mediators (psychological ownership and selfconcordance), and the outcome (organizational job embeddedness) in this study, we controlled for faculty members' age (measured in years), gender (female=0, male=1), and dean-faculty member relationship tenure (measured in years) (e.g., Felps, Mitchell, Herman, Lee, Holtom and Harman, 2009). Table 1 shows the means, standard deviations and correlations for the study variables.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Off-the-job embeddedness. This measure was made up of the unweighted mean of the z-scores of the remaining twelve items in Felps et al, (2009) job embeddedness scale. Following the method used by JET researchers zscores were taken because several of the items were dichotomous (Mitchell et al, 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%