2014
DOI: 10.3854/crm.5.000.checklist.v7.2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turtles of the World, 7th Edition: Annotated Checklist of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution with Maps, and Conservation Status.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0
12

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
84
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 335 recognized turtle species [van Dijk et al, 2014], 87 have a known sex-determining mechanism (SDM) established based on either incubation experiments or cytogenetic evidence [Tree of Sex Consortium, 2014; Montiel et al, 2016]. Phylogenetic analyses recover temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) as the ancestral SDM in turtles, and most evolutionary transitions involved the evolution of genotypic sex determination (GSD) [Janzen and Krenz, 2004;Valenzuela and Adams, 2011], with 2 potential reversals back to TSD inferred by maximum likelihood analysis [Valenzuela and Adams, 2011] ( fig.…”
Section: Evolution Of Turtle Sex Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 335 recognized turtle species [van Dijk et al, 2014], 87 have a known sex-determining mechanism (SDM) established based on either incubation experiments or cytogenetic evidence [Tree of Sex Consortium, 2014; Montiel et al, 2016]. Phylogenetic analyses recover temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) as the ancestral SDM in turtles, and most evolutionary transitions involved the evolution of genotypic sex determination (GSD) [Janzen and Krenz, 2004;Valenzuela and Adams, 2011], with 2 potential reversals back to TSD inferred by maximum likelihood analysis [Valenzuela and Adams, 2011] ( fig.…”
Section: Evolution Of Turtle Sex Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taxon names were updated following Turtle Taxonomy Working Grop (2014). The analysis was run using PAUP v4.0a149 (Swofford, 2002), all characters were considered unordered and equal weighted, multistate taxa interpreted as polymorphism, gaps treated as “missing.” A heuristic search was performed using 10,000 replicates and TBR branch-swapping.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bour and Zaher (2005) developed a new taxonomic arrangement that placed both P. nasutus and P. raniceps (as well as 8 other species) in the genus Mesoclemmys. Current knowledge of the distribution of Mesoclemmys considers M. nasuta to be restricted to French Guiana and Surinam (Bour and Pauler 1987;McCord et al 2001;Bour and Zaher 2005) and M. raniceps to have a broad geographic range that includes Brazil, Bolivia, Perú, Ecuador, Colombia, and Venezuela (Iverson 1992;McCord et al 2001;Bour and Zaher 2005;Rueda-Almonacid et al 2007;Turtle Taxonomy Working Group 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%