Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions

Abstract

Previous research on peer tutoring has found that students sometimes benefit academically from tutoring other students. In this study we combined quantitative and qualitative analyses to explore how untrained peer tutors learned via explaining and responding to tutee questions in a non-reciprocal tutoring setting. In support of our hypotheses, we found that tutors learned most effectively when their instructional activities incorporated reflective knowledge-building in which they monitored their own understanding, generated inferences to repair misunderstandings, and elaborated upon the source materials. However, tutors seemed to adopt a knowledge-telling bias in which they primarily summarized the source materials with little elaboration. Tutors' reflective knowledge-building activities, when they occurred, were more frequently elicited by interactions with their tutee. In particular, when tutees asked questions that contained an inference or required an inferential answer, tutors' responses were more likely to be elaborative and metacognitive. Directions for future research are also discussed.

The Effect of Visual Gender on Abuse in Conversation with ECAs

“…The ECA is a teachable agent which, in brief, means that the agent is taught or trained by the student, and AI techniques guide the agent's behavior based on what it is taught [9,10]. The Learning-by-teaching pedagogy is well documented as being powerful, both in general and as implemented via teachable agents [11,12].…”

Learning by Teaching SimStudent: Technical Accomplishments and an Initial Use with Students

“…1 The tutor agent then demonstrates the step for SimStudent as a hint, which is equivalent to a so-called bottom-out hint.…”

“…There is ample evidence that students learn when they teach their peers [1]. Such an effect of tutor learning has been observed across different subjects, age groups, format of tutoring, and so forth.…”

Monitoring makes a difference: quality and temporal variation in teacher education students’ collaborative learning

“…Complex explanations are especially beneficial for learning (i.e., further evidence is provided and multiple concepts are integrated into the explanation) (Chinn, O'Donnell, & Jinks, 2000;Roscoe & Chi, 2008). Several reasons have been suggested as to why such interactions may benefit participants during these interactions.…”

“…For example, Roscoe and Chi (2008) evaluated events where explaining one's own understanding by using metacognitive statements such as "I didn't understand this before" was useful for making new connections and building understanding at the group level. In other words, meta-level statements activated longer episodes of active knowledge co-construction.…”