2006
DOI: 10.1080/09687760600668594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tutorial chat: a case study of synchronous communication in a learning environment

Malcolm Rutter
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with the growing body of research into the student experience of e-learning that emphasises the student voice (Creanor et al 2006), the voice of the academic is not often evident. The academic voice is more often represented through the narratives of enthusiastic innovators and early adopters of e-learning who report the positive impact of elearning on the student experience, often focusing on the introduction of an innovation in a unit, for example, online discussions (Ellis et al 2007) or synchronous chat (Rutter 2006). Other studies which are more directly focused on the academics themselves often consider the views of innovators and early adopters (Eynon 2006;McShane 2006) or those who are already intensive users of e-learning (Dutton, Hope Cheong and Park 2004), rather than the late adopters.…”
Section: Impact Of E-learning On Academicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with the growing body of research into the student experience of e-learning that emphasises the student voice (Creanor et al 2006), the voice of the academic is not often evident. The academic voice is more often represented through the narratives of enthusiastic innovators and early adopters of e-learning who report the positive impact of elearning on the student experience, often focusing on the introduction of an innovation in a unit, for example, online discussions (Ellis et al 2007) or synchronous chat (Rutter 2006). Other studies which are more directly focused on the academics themselves often consider the views of innovators and early adopters (Eynon 2006;McShane 2006) or those who are already intensive users of e-learning (Dutton, Hope Cheong and Park 2004), rather than the late adopters.…”
Section: Impact Of E-learning On Academicsmentioning
confidence: 99%