2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2018.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tweeting for their lives: Visibility of threatened species on twitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with those of Kidd et al. (2018), which suggests that increased presence of an unpopular species on social media may increase people's interest in protecting unpopular threatened species. We found that an increase in interest in amusing memes in Poland was correlated with a subsequent increase in traditional media reporting about the proboscis monkey (with a 1‐year lag).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings are consistent with those of Kidd et al. (2018), which suggests that increased presence of an unpopular species on social media may increase people's interest in protecting unpopular threatened species. We found that an increase in interest in amusing memes in Poland was correlated with a subsequent increase in traditional media reporting about the proboscis monkey (with a 1‐year lag).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Conservation of such species may require nonstandard actions, and the efficiency of such actions may be enhanced with marketing strategies (Kidd et al. 2018). One possible way to promote unknown and unpopular species (Kidd et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data pertaining to both social media content and engagement can be used for a wide range of conservation purposes. These include analyzing species' popularity and associated sentiment (e.g., Roberge 2014;Kidd et al 2018;Fink et al 2020), monitoring wildlife trade online (e.g., Hinsley et al 2016;Di Minin et al 2019), studying the emergence of digital citizen science communities (Daume & Galaz 2016), and assessing nature-based recreational preferences (e.g., Hausmann et al 2018;Monkman et al 2018b).…”
Section: Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include analyzing species’ popularity and associated sentiment (e.g., Roberge 2014; Kidd et al. 2018; Fink et al. 2020), monitoring wildlife trade online (e.g., Hinsley et al.…”
Section: Culturomics Content As Digital Corporamentioning
confidence: 99%