2012 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems 2012
DOI: 10.1109/fuzz-ieee.2012.6251210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twelve considerations in choosing between Gaussian and trapezoidal membership functions in interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers

Abstract: Interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers (IT2 FLCs) have been attracting great research interests recently. There are many decisions to be made in designing an IT2 FLC. One of them is to determine which membership function type to use, e.g., Gaussian or trapezoidal. There have not been comprehensive studies on this problem so far. In this paper we present 12 considerations in choosing between Gaussian and trapezoidal membership functions for an IT2 FLC, including representation, construction, optimization, adap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some attempts to which type-2 MFs are the best for which application. For instance, in [27], a detailed analysis has been done on Gaussian and trapezoidal MFs in interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers. It has been reported that interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers by using Gaussian MFs are simpler in design, always continuous and faster for small rule-bases, whereas the controllers by using trapezoidal MFs are simpler in analysis [27].…”
Section: Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are some attempts to which type-2 MFs are the best for which application. For instance, in [27], a detailed analysis has been done on Gaussian and trapezoidal MFs in interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers. It has been reported that interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers by using Gaussian MFs are simpler in design, always continuous and faster for small rule-bases, whereas the controllers by using trapezoidal MFs are simpler in analysis [27].…”
Section: Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in [27], a detailed analysis has been done on Gaussian and trapezoidal MFs in interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers. It has been reported that interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers by using Gaussian MFs are simpler in design, always continuous and faster for small rule-bases, whereas the controllers by using trapezoidal MFs are simpler in analysis [27]. Another path in research is the auto-generation of fuzzy MFs [28], however, the interpretation of these methods is still limited.…”
Section: Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, IT2-FLCs are difficult to analyze and design since their internal structure is typically more complex than their type-1 counterpart [12]. In this context, several studies have been performed in order to design the IT2-FLCs [13][14][15]. Nevertheless, a systematic design for type-2 fuzzy controllers is still a challenging problem due to the main difficulty in determining the IT2-FSs and rulebase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still a lot of research need as to which type-2 MFs are best for which application. In [9], a detailed analysis has been done on Gaussian and trapezoidal MFs in interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers. It has been reported that interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers by using Gaussian MFs are simpler in design, always continuous and faster for small rulebases, whereas the controllers by using trapezoidal MFs are simpler in analysis [9].…”
Section: Existing Type-2 Mfs In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%