2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05235-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twelve Hundred Consecutive Pancreato‐Duodenectomies from Single Centre: Impact of Centre of Excellence on Pancreatic Cancer Surgery Across India

Abstract: Background Pancreato-duodenectomy (PD) is a technically challenging operation with significant morbidity and mortality. Over the period of time, Tata Memorial Centre has evolved into a high-volume centre for management of pancreatic cancer. Aim of this study is to report the short-and long-term outcomes of 1200 consecutive PDs performed at single tertiary cancer centre in India. Methods 1200 PDs were performed from 1992 to 2017. Prospectively maintained database was used to retrospectively assess the short-and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With considerable improvement in survival over past decades and corresponding decrease in morbidity [30] ,identi cation of prognostic markes should help us in further improving patient outcomes .However our study did not nd any signi cant association between this markers and overall survival and although the survival was better with low NLR and high LMR for all cut offs, it did not reach statistical signi cance. One of the reasons for this may be that, although individually this test may not be predictive of survival, a combination of two or more of these variables may be a better marker to assess prognosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…With considerable improvement in survival over past decades and corresponding decrease in morbidity [30] ,identi cation of prognostic markes should help us in further improving patient outcomes .However our study did not nd any signi cant association between this markers and overall survival and although the survival was better with low NLR and high LMR for all cut offs, it did not reach statistical signi cance. One of the reasons for this may be that, although individually this test may not be predictive of survival, a combination of two or more of these variables may be a better marker to assess prognosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Our low rates of major complications and zero mortality in this series 494 resections over 5 weeks not only reflects our '''Covid 19 centric policy'' of case selection, adopting best surgical practices and having the best operating teams (average age 40 years) led by senior consultants (with an average age of 48 years) but also confirm that there were no deviations from earlier benchmarks established by the various surgical specialties in the pre-Covid era. [7][8][9][10] Also, all 6 patients detected with COVID infection in the postoperative period, did not develop any major complication with uneventful recovery. Although a small number, all of them had undergone major resections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Hence, in our study, we use objective resectability criteria (given by NCCN for PDAC) for determining resectability of primary tumor (as shown in fig2 and fig 4). GEP-NETs patients described in our study were all deemed unresectable primary before PRRT by a surgeon with expertise in GI and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery 22 . PRRT is generally well tolerated as compared to chemotherapy and other treatment modalities in GEP-NETs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%