2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twelve-month supply of short-acting contraception methods: Pharmacists’ perspectives on implementation of new state law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barriers to implementation and suggestions to address them mainly focused on concerns regarding organization‐ and environmental‐level issues such as insurance coverage, the potential utility of EMR prescription defaults, and a need for more training for clinicians and pharmacists. Many of these findings such as decreasing patient burden, concerns with decreased patient contact, and issues with insurance coverage were consistent with a study of Massachusetts pharmacists' perspectives on the ACCESS law 20 . Inductively derived sub‐themes identified opportunities to further explore the potential role of paternalism, implicit bias, and patient autonomy in SARC prescribing decisions and clinicians' perceived autonomy in decision making with patients in relation to clinician's specialty.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Barriers to implementation and suggestions to address them mainly focused on concerns regarding organization‐ and environmental‐level issues such as insurance coverage, the potential utility of EMR prescription defaults, and a need for more training for clinicians and pharmacists. Many of these findings such as decreasing patient burden, concerns with decreased patient contact, and issues with insurance coverage were consistent with a study of Massachusetts pharmacists' perspectives on the ACCESS law 20 . Inductively derived sub‐themes identified opportunities to further explore the potential role of paternalism, implicit bias, and patient autonomy in SARC prescribing decisions and clinicians' perceived autonomy in decision making with patients in relation to clinician's specialty.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%