Twelve tips for teaching medical students about female genital mutilation (FGM)

Mayhew, Jonathan; Gishen, Faye; Kavanagh, Jayne

doi:10.15694/mep.2019.000117.1

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are many training programmes to support the in-service needs of clinicians to care for women and girls with or at risk of FGM that focus on building cultural competency and communication skills for FGM consultations [ 139 , 140 ] and supporting professionals to prepare for a safeguarding interaction [ 141 , 142 ]. Guidance has also been provided for training medical, nursing and midwifery students [ 143 , 144 ]. Evaluations of FGM training programmes have not clarified how this has translated to PCC in practice [ 145 – 147 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Woman and girl-centred care for those affected by female genital mutilation: a scoping review of provider tools and guidelines

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background A woman and girl centred, rights-based approach to health care is critical to achieving sexual and reproductive health. However, women with female genital mutilation in high-income countries have been found to receive sub-optimal care. This study examined documents guiding clinicians in health and community service settings in English-speaking high-income countries to identify approaches to ensure quality women and girl-centred care for those with or at risk of female genital mutilation. Method We undertook a scoping review using the integrative model of patient-centredness to identify principles, enablers, and activities to facilitate woman and girl-centred care interactions. We developed an inclusion criterion to identify documents such as guidance statements and tools and technical guidelines, procedural documents and clinical practice guidelines. We searched the databases and websites of health professional associations, ministries of health, hospitals, national, state and local government and non-government organisations working in female genital mutilation in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, The United States, New Zealand, and Australia. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool was used to appraise screened documents. Findings One-hundred and twenty-four documents were included in this scoping review; 88 were developed in the United Kingdom, 20 in Australia, nine in the United States, three in Canada, two in New Zealand and two in Ireland. The focus of documents from the United Kingdom on multi-professional safeguarding (62), while those retrieved from Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the US focused on clinical practice. Twelve percent of the included documents contained references to all principles of patient-centred care, and only one document spoke to all principles, enablers and activities. Conclusion This study demonstrates the need to improve the female genital mutilation-related guidance provided to professionals to care for and protect women and girls. Professionals need to involve women and girls with or at risk of female genital mutilation in the co-design of guidelines and tools and evaluation of them and the co-production of health care.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%