2016
DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccw041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twelve years of telecollaboration: what we have learnt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For pre-implementation setup, we have considered the work of Guth & Rubin (2015), who suggest that collaborating teachers, in a first moment, should share details of the academic culture in their institutions (such as the number of hours per week, grading scheme, expectations in relation to class attendance, participation in class, in-class and out-of-class amount of work) and advise teachers to align objectives and avoid overloading students in order to give them enough time to engage in communication with their peers. In a reflection about the evolution of their telecollaborative project over twelve years, Sadler & Dooly (2016) also highlight that, despite of the physical distance, it is essential that teachers work closely during collaboration and fully share "the planning of the calendar, activities, interaction, output, assessment, and implementation…thereby giving the students two referents in each class (a local and an international teacher)" (p. 412).…”
Section: Instructional Design In Telecollaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pre-implementation setup, we have considered the work of Guth & Rubin (2015), who suggest that collaborating teachers, in a first moment, should share details of the academic culture in their institutions (such as the number of hours per week, grading scheme, expectations in relation to class attendance, participation in class, in-class and out-of-class amount of work) and advise teachers to align objectives and avoid overloading students in order to give them enough time to engage in communication with their peers. In a reflection about the evolution of their telecollaborative project over twelve years, Sadler & Dooly (2016) also highlight that, despite of the physical distance, it is essential that teachers work closely during collaboration and fully share "the planning of the calendar, activities, interaction, output, assessment, and implementation…thereby giving the students two referents in each class (a local and an international teacher)" (p. 412).…”
Section: Instructional Design In Telecollaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These involve synchronous and asynchronous multimedia exchanges through the use of online communication tools among students from at least two different physically and geographically dispersed classes (Belz, ; Kinginger, ), set up in an institutional context “with the aim of developing both language skills and intercultural communicative competence […] through structured tasks” (Guth & Helm, , p. 14). In these exchanges, students collaborate while co‐producing mutual objectives and sharing learning (Sadler & Dooly, ).…”
Section: Online Intercultural Exchanges: Goals and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…through structured tasks" (Guth & Helm, 2010, p. 14). In these exchanges, students collaborate while co-producing mutual objectives and sharing learning (Sadler & Dooly, 2016).…”
Section: What This Paper Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25], collaborative work was described as conducive to group autonomy, in particular self-regulative activities. Others have found a positive effect technology-enhanced learning environments have on learner autonomy and self-regulation [18], [24], [27]. It might seem that telecollaboration have not had the same positive effect on Mariaś SRL and perception of the course usefulness.…”
Section: B Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The course has been implemented every academic year since 2003 [27]. It is highly intense and requires a lot of independent work from the course students (future primary school teachers).…”
Section: A the Context Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%