Twenty Challenges in Incident Planning

Abstract

Disasters create overwhelming demands to affected communities and pose unique problems that complicate efforts of orchestrating the response. It is in such environments of uncertainty, operational friction, time-constraints and the need for interagency coordination that disaster and crisis managers are required to develop incident plans to address multiple demands. Based on observations from 50 disaster exercises, we have identified twenty critical points in incident planning, that is, those incident planning activities which are most challenging for emergency managers, are poorly implemented or otherwise constitute an area for improvement. The most challenging components of the incident planning process were information gathering from the field, running estimates of the situation, response-generated demands, resource capabilities and mobilization time, course of action development and analysis, and decision-making under uncertainty. In addition, this study identified three good practices in incident planning. First, the process is iterative and planners revisit several steps in a back-and-forth fashion. Second, both rational and intuitive decision-making processes are likely to be used during the course of any one incident, based on the time available for planning. Third, better plans are produced when flexibility is built into courses of action to address expected developments of situation or when decision-making is decentralized.

Wildfire risk management in the era of climate change

“…A combination of forward and reverse planning is required to prepare such plans ( 84 , 85 ). Forward planning builds the evacuation process by describing potential decisions and actions sequentially.…”

Tsunami Hazard Assessment and Potential Risk Mitigation Requirement for Sea of Marmara Coastline

“…Primary disaster research highlighted that disasters require administrations to develop new goals and objectives, to refine their internal structure, to organize and share resources with other organizations, and to establish new structures altogether (Auf der Heide 1989). Emergency planning endeavors to build an emergency response system before disaster strikes (Perry and Lindell, 2006;Karagiannis and Synolakis, 2017).…”

The common operating picture as a collaborative governance tool for urban resilience

“…For others, the COP is an information exchange platform and a dynamic process to develop a common understanding between different actors during crisis situations (Wolbers & Boersma, 2013). Disasters extend across geographical and functional jurisdictions, and disaster response is the responsibility of multiple organizations with different mandates (Karagiannis & Synolakis, 2016). During crisis responses, information sharing and coordination between agencies can face challenges arising from the impacts of the crisis on information systems, problems related to the integration of information systems (Bharosa et al, 2010) and organizational barriers to sharing information (Bunker et al, 2015), even as it remains crucial for effective response and collective decision‐making (Bharosa et al, 2010).…”