Twenty-five years of research on work and organizational psychology: A bibliometric perspective

Romeo, Marina; Yepes-Baldó, Montserrat; Boria‐Reverter, Sefa; Merigó, José M.

doi:10.1016/j.anpsic.2017.04.002

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The findings were also consistent with the study of Gan and Yusof (2020). However, JAP was the most influential journal in the OCB studies and the organizational psychology field (Romeo et al, 2017). Besides, de Geus et al (2020) uncovered that the Journal of Human Resource Management and Journal of Applied Psychology was in the top 10 most prolific journals list of OCB studies with the Public Sector.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Organizational Citizenship Behavior From 2000 to 2019

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last two decades, researchers have put significant efforts into exploring knowledge in the area of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). This study aimed to investigate the global research trends in the OCB field based on publication outputs. The analysis focused on the top authors, journals, institutions, and countries. Using the Scopus database, a total of 4,324 publications from 2000 to 2019 were retrieved. A series of bibliometric indicators such as h-index, citations, and productivity were used to conduct the performance analysis. Moreover, the VOS viewer was employed to visualize the scientific landscapes. The graphical analysis used bibliographic co-authorship coupling among affiliated countries and author keywords from the bibliographic coupling of co-occurrence. The result indicated that there had been a dramatically increasing trend of study on OCB. In addition, the United States ranked first in terms of production, journals, citation impact, co-authorship, institutions, and authors in this subject. Furthermore, OCB has mainly been associated with the topics of job satisfaction and leadership. Apart from that, some other themes linked with OCB in recent studies were also found out. Our research plays an informative and complementary role as it provided most of the key aspects of OCB.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Organizational Citizenship Behavior From 2000 to 2019

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similar procedures have been implemented to map psychological research in particular geographical regions such as Asia (Haslam & Kashima, 2010), Europe (Íñiguez-Rueda et al, 2008;Schui & Krampen, 2007), South America (Fierro et al, 2018), and the post-Soviet countries (Fedorov, 2019;Lovakov & Agadullina, 2019). Researchers have also used bibliometric approaches to map the literature produced in several branches of psychology, such as positive psychology (Schui & Krampen 2010), personality psychology (Allik, 2013), and applied psychology (Romeo et al, 2017).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications in the Web of Science Category of Educational Psychology in the Last Two Decades

Hernández-Torrano

2021

Psicología Educativa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Educational psychology is a discipline with a relatively long and intricate history (Alexander et al., 2012;Berliner, 2006; Zimmerman & Schunk, 2003). There is widespread agreement that modern educational psychology begins with the birth of psychology at the hands of Williams James in the late 19th century and the work of G. Stanley Hall, J. Dewey, and especially Edward L. Thorndike, who wrote what is considered the first text in educational psychology. However, it is not until 1920 when educational psychology is commonly recognized as a separate branch of psychology (Glover & Ronning, 1987).Over the last 100 years, educational psychology has evolved to become a distinctive and mature discipline (Glover & Ronning, 1987;Miller & Reynolds, 2003). Keathley-Herring et al. (2016) define the maturity of a field or discipline based on "how and to what extent that area has developed over time, with a special interest in the creation, growth, and dissemination of knowledge" (p. 939). According to the authors, the maturity of a field is determined by a wide variety of criteria, including publication characteristics (publication quantity), research design characteristics (the rigor of methods), theoretical characteristics (development of new theories and applicability of theories), content characteristics (variety of themes, connections between sub-themes), impact (author prominence), diffusion (the existence of communities of practice and professional associations), and academic and research infrastructure (academic programs).

show abstract

“…Thus, we analyzed the following top ten U.S.-based I/O psychology journals: Journal of Management, Journal of Applied Psychology, Personnel Psychology, Organizational Research Methods, Leadership Quarterly, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, and Journal of Business and Psychology, and in accordance with other research (e.g., Romeo et al 2017). Using the Scopus database (at www.scopu s.com), we obtained data from these journals for the years 2006 to 2016.…”

Section: Samplementioning

confidence: 99%

How much is research in the top journals of industrial/organizational psychology dominated by authors from the U.S.?

Bajwa

König

2019

Scientometrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industrial/organizational (I/O) psychology, the subfield of psychology applied to the context of work, has been criticized for being dominated by U.S. authors because this dominance could prevent the generalizability of results and the enrichment of theories, paradigms, and approaches by researchers from other parts of the world. Previous estimates on the extent of the U.S. dominance are, however, likely restricted in scope, outdated, and likely biased by non-U.S. researchers who were socialized in the U.S. or received help by U.S. co-authors. As such, we measured the level of U.S. dominance by analyzing 5626 papers published from the top ten journals of the field of I/O psychology in the last eleven years and their authors. The results show that the U.S. dominance continues, although the internationalization of I/O psychology has steadily increased. An additional analysis of the gender distribution across our sample revealed that female first authorship is slightly more common among authors with no U.S. affiliation. We suggest several steps to further increase the level of internationalization.

show abstract

Twenty-five years of research on work and organizational psychology: A bibliometric perspective

Cited by 4 publications

References 37 publications

Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Organizational Citizenship Behavior From 2000 to 2019

Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Organizational Citizenship Behavior From 2000 to 2019

A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications in the Web of Science Category of Educational Psychology in the Last Two Decades

How much is research in the top journals of industrial/organizational psychology dominated by authors from the U.S.?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About