2008
DOI: 10.1177/230949900801600126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twenty-Year Survival of a Cementless Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Press-Fit Bulk Acetabular Allograft for Pelvic Discontinuity: A Case Report

Abstract: Acetabular revision in a total hip arthroplasty (THA) with pelvic discontinuity is uncommon and challenging. Optimal management remains controversial, particularly with graft and implant selection. Interpretation of outcomes is confounded by the heterogeneity of patterns of bone loss and the lack of long-term results in great numbers for any given choice of treatment. We report a revision THA using a press-fit bulk acetabular allograft and an uncemented porous-coated anatomic prosthesis for the management of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Garbuz15 also advocated the use of cage along with acetabular allograft for better results. A survival of as long as 20 years with an excellent functional outcome with radiographic evidence of graft incorporation and no signs of loosening has been shown by Gul et al 12. The acetabular allograft showed evidence of union at a follow-up of 15 months in our case; however, a longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the tendency of some of these massive allografts to resorb in the long term.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Garbuz15 also advocated the use of cage along with acetabular allograft for better results. A survival of as long as 20 years with an excellent functional outcome with radiographic evidence of graft incorporation and no signs of loosening has been shown by Gul et al 12. The acetabular allograft showed evidence of union at a follow-up of 15 months in our case; however, a longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the tendency of some of these massive allografts to resorb in the long term.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Reconstruction of supportive columns and the posterior wall with auto and/or allografts favors the use of cementless components, which have been associated with better outcomes [5] Reconstruction options include reinforcement rings and cages [6] , multihole acetabular shell and. Cementless implants are preferred on the acetabular side when the posterior column can be stabilized and at least 50% host bone-implant contact can be achieved [7] The center of rotation of the hip was not restored in our case. Because of acetabular defect, we could not put the hip in the proper position but acetabular cup was stable intraoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Reconstruction options include bone cement ( 12 ), autografts or allografts ( 6 , 7 ), and reinforcement rings and cages ( 13 ). Cementless implants are preferred on the acetabular side when the posterior column can be stabilized and at least 50% host bone-implant contact can be achieved ( 14 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%