Twenty years of carbon accounting and auditing – a review and outlook

Abstract

This paper aims to provide an overview of the key themes in the development of carbon accounting and auditing over the past twentytwenty years. The evolution of the field since the Kyoto Agreement of 1997 has been divided into four stages. The need to account for and disclosure of greenhouse gas-related emissions of industrial organizations has emerged parallel to growing concerns about climate change, and international and national policy developments in the field have followed. Carbon accounting is an emerging field of business economics and covers a wide range of activities, including the measurement, calculation, monitoring, reporting and auditing of greenhouse gas emissions at organizational, process, product or supply chain levels. Various initiatives (such as the Greenhouse Gas Protocol or the Carbon Disclosure Project) motivate and assist industrial organizations in accounting for and reporting their achievements in the field. Different methodologies of carbon accounting (bottom-up, top-down and hybrid) enable industrial organizations to quantify their emissions; however, some tradeoffs emerge when choosing among these approaches. Carbon accounting should not be an isolated task for businesses. On the contrary, there is a strong need to integrate carbon accounting issues into different functional fields in order to achieve both corporate and climate policy goals. JEL-codes: F23, M14, Q56

Carbon Accounting Measurement with Digital Non-Financial Corporate Reporting and a Comparison to European Automotive Companies Statements

“…Carbon accounting is an emerging field of business economics and covers a wide range of activities, including measurement, calculation, monitoring, reporting, and auditing [1]. Industrial companies use large amounts of energy and materials in their activities and are therefore particularly responsible for greenhouse gas emissions.…”

Example of a German Free-Float Car-Sharing Company Expansion in East-Central Europe

“…Indeed, sharing economy can be considered as a path towards sustainability [10]. Bernardi and Diamantini [11] explored how sharing economy, adopted by an increasing number of cities, may be integrated into the urban agenda, fostering its positive aspects (like decreased carbon emissions [12]), while avoiding its negative externalities, and focused, as examples, on Milan and Seoul. Ma et al [13] proposed an alternative governance model to improve the effectiveness of a collaborative governance regime towards urban sustainability.…”

Ecological Footprint at the Micro-Scale—How It Can Save Costs: The Case of ENPRO

“…There is a massive body of literature discussing the conceptual framework of corporate carbon footprinting [32,33]. Indeed, many companies and other organizations tend to measure, control and report their carbon emissions.…”

“…Over the last twenty years, the field of carbon accounting has evolved a lot and provided useful information for organizations for different purposes. Csutora and Harangozo [32] differentiated four subsequent phases of this evolution:…”