1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(83)80092-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twenty years of endodontic success and failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
138
2
32

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
14
138
2
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent long-term clinical studies indicate that direct pulp capping can produce success rates of between 80% and 90% (14)(15)(16). These figures compare favourably with the success rate of 85% to 90% that can be expected from root canal treatment (17).…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…Recent long-term clinical studies indicate that direct pulp capping can produce success rates of between 80% and 90% (14)(15)(16). These figures compare favourably with the success rate of 85% to 90% that can be expected from root canal treatment (17).…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…The high success rate in the present work of teeth that were overfilled contrasts with the findings of some other studies. [5][6][7] Interestingly, however, overfilling did not produce the worst results in the work of Barbakow et al, [8][9] and Boggia 23 deliberately overfilled 52 non-vital teeth with Endomethasone (Septodont) containing paraformaldehyde with no failures. Again, the non-standardised method of obtaining the radiographic images may have affected the outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[3][4][5][6][7] Molven and Halse 6 examined root canal treatment performed by dental students and found success rates of 68% for teeth with preexisting periapical radiolucencies, and 91% in teeth without preexisting periapical radiolucencies. Heling and Tamshe 4 reported an overall success rate of 70% in 213 teeth that were also treated by dental undergraduates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Traditionally, in connection with molar teeth specifically, the perception has tended to be that the outcome of RCT here is likely to be worse than for other teeth. In fact some studies have confirmed this [16][17][18][19] but others have not. [20][21][22][23] What is evident, however, is that molar RCT has become more widely practised in recent years and, in consequence, the number of molars being orthograde root-filled has now actually outstripped the number of anterior teeth so treated (Table 1).…”
Section: Verifiable Cpd Papermentioning
confidence: 99%