1981
DOI: 10.1104/pp.67.6.1230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twilight Effect: Initiating Dark Measurement in Photoperiodism of Xanthium

Frank B. Salisbury

Abstract: Six experiments studied the effects of low levels of red and far-red light upon the initiation of measurement of the dark period in the photoperiodic induction of flowering in Xanthium stunarium L. (cocklebur), a short-day plant, and compared effects with those of comparable light treatments applied for 2 hours during the middle of a 16-hour inductive dark period. Red Ught, or red plus far-red, at levels that inhibit flowering when applied during the middle of the inductive dark period, either had no effect on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flowering time of PGMR and its original line equally delayed for about 7 days relative to SD controls, and the percentage of flowering inhibition by FR was 11.1% and 10.3%, respectively. This is consistent with previous reports that EOD FR inhibited flowering in several SDPs, including Chenopodium rubrum (King and Cumming 1972), Pharbitis nil (Takimoto and Hamner 1965) and Xanthium strumarium (Salisbury 1981 Data are means from two independent experiments (5 replica). A, floret number.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The flowering time of PGMR and its original line equally delayed for about 7 days relative to SD controls, and the percentage of flowering inhibition by FR was 11.1% and 10.3%, respectively. This is consistent with previous reports that EOD FR inhibited flowering in several SDPs, including Chenopodium rubrum (King and Cumming 1972), Pharbitis nil (Takimoto and Hamner 1965) and Xanthium strumarium (Salisbury 1981 Data are means from two independent experiments (5 replica). A, floret number.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The first obvious case to consider is our own moon. The photon flux density received on the Earth from our moon is estimated to be 0.5 nmol photon m −2 s −1 (Munz and McFarland 1973), 3 nmol photon m −2 s −1 (Salisbury 1981) and 5 nmol photon m −2 s −1 (Gorbunov and Falkowski 2002). Subsequent estimates are 3 nmol photon m −2 s −1 (Johnsen et al 2006) and 12 nmol photon m −2 s −1 (Cummings et al 2008).…”
Section: Photosynthesis Induced By Moonlightmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similarly, the ratio of UV to PAR is highest near noon. There is some enrichment of FR relative to R at twilight (Salisbury, 1981). Spatially, UV:PAR ratios are typically higher at low latitudes.…”
Section: Light As An Environmental Variablementioning
confidence: 99%