2020
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8af4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twin Stars and the Stiffness of the Nuclear Equation of State: Ruling Out Strong Phase Transitions below 1.7 n0 with the New NICER Radius Measurements

Abstract: We explore the connection between the stiffness of a hadronic equation of state (EoS) with a sharp phase transition to quark matter to its tidal deformability. For this we employ a hadronic relativistic mean field model with a parameterized effective nucleon mass to vary the stiffness in conjunction with a constant speed of sound EoS for quark matter. We compute multiple scenarios with phase transitions according to the four possible cases of a hybrid star EoS with a stable second branch. We demonstrate how th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
69
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, since GW170817 provided an upper limit onΛ, any physical effect that results in a softening of the equation of state can be consistent with the data [88,[240][241][242][243][244][245][246] As such, a strong first-order phase transition might make an equation of state model compatible with the GW170817 data, even if the hadronic part on its own is not [152,[247][248][249][250]. A number of studies have constructed models that can successfully interpret the inspiral signal from GW170817 as the coalescence of any combination of hadronic and hybrid hadronic-quark neutron stars and place corresponding constraints on the relevant model parameter space [149,247,248,[251][252][253][254][255][256][257][258][259][260].…”
Section: Microscopic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In general, since GW170817 provided an upper limit onΛ, any physical effect that results in a softening of the equation of state can be consistent with the data [88,[240][241][242][243][244][245][246] As such, a strong first-order phase transition might make an equation of state model compatible with the GW170817 data, even if the hadronic part on its own is not [152,[247][248][249][250]. A number of studies have constructed models that can successfully interpret the inspiral signal from GW170817 as the coalescence of any combination of hadronic and hybrid hadronic-quark neutron stars and place corresponding constraints on the relevant model parameter space [149,247,248,[251][252][253][254][255][256][257][258][259][260].…”
Section: Microscopic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Notice that all the hybrid models of Table I allow the existence of twin objects, i.e., couples of stars with the same gravitational mass but different radii. This is a very relevant signature that may be used to scrutinize the internal composition of compact objects [8,10,[51][52][53][54]. In fact, new missions probing neutron star radii such as Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) will be able to measure NS radii with 5%-10% uncertainty, while the future enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry (eXTP) is expected to have even better precision.…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the recent detection of very massive pulsars [43][44][45] with ≈2 M ⊙ puts stringent constraints on the nuclear EOS at supranuclear densities. Moreover, with the advent of GW observations of binary neutron star mergers [1,2,46], additional constraints are emerging [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Hadronic Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead of stiffening the quark EoS one could consider to soften the hadronic EoS at intermediate densities. A new analysis of the NICER data gives hint that an extremely soft nuclear EoS and a strong phase transition are mutually exclusive [83]. A softening of the hadronic phase is possible through the appearance of additional baryonic degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Vmit Bag Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%