Handbook of Behavior Genetics 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-76727-7_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twin Studies of General Mental Ability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an ongoing matter of debate as to how to classify this covariance in the calculation of heritability; certainly many, if not most, scholars would agree that it fits neatly in neither the G nor the E category. Several behavioral geneticists have argued that such gene-environment correlations should be classified as genetic effects (e.g., Fowler, Baker, and Dawes, 2008;Segal and Johnson, 2009); however, as Rutter (2002: 4) noted, "it is misleading to suppose that just because genetic factors influence the occurrence of an environmental risk factor, this must mean that the risk process is genetically mediated. This assumption does not follow because there is no necessary connection between the causes of the origin of a risk factor and its mode of risk mediation."…”
Section: Conceptual Problem: (The Fallacy Of) Partitioning Genetic Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an ongoing matter of debate as to how to classify this covariance in the calculation of heritability; certainly many, if not most, scholars would agree that it fits neatly in neither the G nor the E category. Several behavioral geneticists have argued that such gene-environment correlations should be classified as genetic effects (e.g., Fowler, Baker, and Dawes, 2008;Segal and Johnson, 2009); however, as Rutter (2002: 4) noted, "it is misleading to suppose that just because genetic factors influence the occurrence of an environmental risk factor, this must mean that the risk process is genetically mediated. This assumption does not follow because there is no necessary connection between the causes of the origin of a risk factor and its mode of risk mediation."…”
Section: Conceptual Problem: (The Fallacy Of) Partitioning Genetic Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other twin studies including one in Russia (Malykh et al, 2005). For a recent review of twin studies, see Segal and Johnson (2009) and for recent studies, see (Bratko et al, 2010; Davis et al, 2009). Very large studies that include both twin and singleton data (Calvin et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an ongoing matter of debate as to how to classify this covariance in the calculation of heritability; certainly many, if not most, scholars would agree that it fits neatly in neither the G nor the E category. Several behavioral geneticists have argued that such gene–environment correlations should be classified as genetic effects (e.g., Fowler, Baker, and Dawes, ; Segal and Johnson, ); however, as Rutter (: 4) noted, “it is misleading to suppose that just because genetic factors influence the occurrence of an environmental risk factor, this must mean that the risk process is genetically mediated. This assumption does not follow because there is no necessary connection between the causes of the origin of a risk factor and its mode of risk mediation.” This can be illustrated with real‐world examples such as skin pigmentation (Billings, Beckwith, and Alper, ; Joseph, ).…”
Section: Heritability Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%