2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twinning-induced softening in polycrystalline AM30 Mg alloy at moderate temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
86
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This characteristic is the opposite of that of AZ 31B magnesium alloy, in which the n value decreases linearly as ε increases from 1.0 × 10 −5 s −1 to 1.0 × 10 −2 s −1 at RT 35) . This behavior has also been observed in AM30 magnesium alloy tested at 298 K, and the authors claimed that it was caused by the twinning-induced softening effect in deformed HCP-structural alloy 36) . However, the HR LZ141 is a BCC structural alloy, instead of an HCP one, and no twinning is observed in deformed specimens.…”
Section: Discussion On Tensile and Charpy Impact Properties Of Hr Lz1mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This characteristic is the opposite of that of AZ 31B magnesium alloy, in which the n value decreases linearly as ε increases from 1.0 × 10 −5 s −1 to 1.0 × 10 −2 s −1 at RT 35) . This behavior has also been observed in AM30 magnesium alloy tested at 298 K, and the authors claimed that it was caused by the twinning-induced softening effect in deformed HCP-structural alloy 36) . However, the HR LZ141 is a BCC structural alloy, instead of an HCP one, and no twinning is observed in deformed specimens.…”
Section: Discussion On Tensile and Charpy Impact Properties Of Hr Lz1mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Theoretical ORs of f10 1 11g twin and f10 1 13g twin are 56 h11 2 20i and 64 h11 2 20i respectively, and the double twinning of them will lead to the ORs of 38.7 h11 2 20i and 22 h11 2 20i. 3,8,9) The misorientation data in Fig. 2 reveal that most misorientation angles are larger than those due to double twinning (38 and 22 ), but smaller than those of two types of compression twins (56 and 64 ).…”
Section: Determination Of Twin Orientation and Orientationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recently, EBSD technique has been used to analyze compression twins through the determination of the twin orientation relationships (OR). 8,9) To date, the analysis on compression twin has been less reported than that of tension twin, and the variety of compression twin types as well as the condition of double twinning is still not clearly understood. This is because the compression twin analysis has three challenges: (1) The compression twins are very thin in nature (normally less than 1 mm), it is hard to confirm their types on a large scale; (2) unlike the very mobile boundaries of tension twins which leads to stable OR of 86.3 h11 2 20i, the immobile twin boundaries of the compression twins and their unstable orientation against basal slip or tension twinning can cause frequent change in twin orientation; (3) In some cases, it is not easy to exactly confirm the twin forms by detecting the OR, for example, the OR of 38.7 h11 2 20i for double twinning is similar to the OR of 41 h11 2 20i for f10 1 15g twins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is observed that {10 1} contraction twinning and double twinning can be activated in the RD (Fig. 4), and they increased linearly with the increase of Q. Decreasing strain hardening resulted from the formation of contraction and double twins due to the reduction of the strain hardening index, n (Jiang, Jonas, Luo, Sachdev, & Godet, 2006). Extension twinning may also be activated in the TD.…”
Section: Influence Of Twinning On Mechanical Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 97%