2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twisting tongues and memories: Explorations of the relationship between language production and verbal working memory

Abstract: Many accounts of working memory posit specialized storage mechanisms for the maintenance of serial order. We explore an alternative, that maintenance is achieved through temporary activation in the language production architecture. Four experiments examined the extent to which the phonological similarity effect can be explained as a sublexical speech error. Phonologically similar nonword stimuli were ordered to create tongue twister or control materials used in four tasks: reading aloud, immediate spoken recal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(99 reference statements)
7
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…lexical level in the case of ISR for lists of familiar words) utterance plan designed to accomplish the reproduction of a recently encountered sequence of verbal items (Page et al 2007). Other recent data have been supportive of this characterization (Acheson & MacDonald 2009) and of the close links that this suggests between ISR and speech production (cf. Ellis 1980;Page & Norris 1998b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…lexical level in the case of ISR for lists of familiar words) utterance plan designed to accomplish the reproduction of a recently encountered sequence of verbal items (Page et al 2007). Other recent data have been supportive of this characterization (Acheson & MacDonald 2009) and of the close links that this suggests between ISR and speech production (cf. Ellis 1980;Page & Norris 1998b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For instance, in order to perform any short-term memory task, one must have the capacity to perceive words and to produce words. Similarly in language processing, memory for order is paramount as both processing and producing an utterance involves remembering the order of words in a sentence, and phonemes within a word (Acheson & MacDonald, 2009a). …”
Section: Memory For Order As Part Of the Language Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of proposed language-based models of STM have incorporated strong relationships between temporary storage systems and language long-term representations in order to account for the influence of language representations on STM capacities described hereinabove (e.g., Acheson, Hamidi, Binder, & Postle, 2011;Acheson & MacDonald, 2009a;2009b;Hickock, 2012;Majerus, 2009;2013;N. Martin & Saffran., 1992; N. ; R. Martin et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%